Jump to content

Questions concerning stoeckler divided developer


rob_haury

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I plan to give the stoeckler divided developer a try. I'll be using it with fp4. Has anybody tried mixing a more concentrated stock solution and diluting it later? I'm also wondering what the shelf life is. It seems to me that one should be able to use a faster EI since showdow development is independant of highlight I currently use 80. Any thoughts? Also, any suggestions for a starting point for dev time testing would be appreciated.

 

<p>

 

I also wanted to say that the thoughtful comments regarding the recent disaster in New York and Washington show a high level of sensitivity amoungst the contributors of this forum. Good show.

 

<p>

 

Thanks

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try looking at www.unblinkingeye.com, and the section on divided D-23

developer for more info on the subject. In my version of the divided

developer, I keep a concentrated version of the second part of the

developer, but mix the first part fresh every time. I have been using

TMax 400, and rating it at 400. I have no experience with Ilford

films and this developer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 100 grams of sulfite in solution A should give it very good

keeping qualities. D-23 was designed to be reused and replenished. It

is probably feasible to make a concentrated solution by dissolving in

250ml of water instead of a liter--then you could dilute 1+3 with

water for use. In the article by Jim Veenstra on Divided D-23

(published in View Camera), the author gives developing times for T-

Max 100 and 400 at the manufacturer's rated speed, but he rates Tri-X

at 200.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob. You seem to have slightly the wrong idea of how divided

development works. The shadow develoment isn't independent of the

highlights at all.<br>What actually happens is that shadow development

proceeds normally, but areas of heavier density, the highlights, are

starved of developer. This tends to give an early shoulder to the

density curve of the film, and prevents highlights reaching an

unprintable density, even with heavy exposure. Shadow and low-midtones

are hardly affected at all.<br>In short, no, a two bath developer

won't give an increase in film speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...