natwinston Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 ok, long story short, my dad has bought his first dslr, an xsi body only. he is disabled and pretty much only can sit on the porch and take pictures of birds. he is on a very fixed income due to his disability and can spend maybe $200 on a lens.so my question is: would the 75-300mm usm III lens be good enough for his purposes, or is it just going to disappoint? i know this lens gets bashed in every review i've seen but he's used to a 4 year old p&s so i was hoping this would still be pretty good for him.sorry if this has been asked hundreds of times before, i'm pretty new to the hobby myself and i went the nikon route so i don't know much about the canon lenses.the xsi does look pretty sweet though :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derrickdehaan Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I bought my XTi with a Tamron AF 75-300 f4-5.6 LD Macro lens. Just over a hundred bucks, but I get darn good pictures for the price. The downside is that the front element rotates when focusing so circular polarizers, etc can be a pain to use. I have not used the lens you mention, but thought I would mention this one. Derrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainer_t Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 In the 200$ range, you'll likely not find a lens that is signifficantly better than the old EF 75-300. If you consider used glass, you might also have a look on the EF 100-300/4.5-5.6 USM. (Its signifficantly better build than the 75-300, and it also has a true ring USM, FTM, and a non-rotating frontlens). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danield Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Nat I'd say try to stretch to a Canon 55-250mm IS lens. It's $280 at Amazon.com - a bit over the budget, but much, much more useful than the canon 75-300. There are two reasons for this - it has better optics and it has image stabilization(IS), which is invaluable at this length. I wouldn't buy any telephoto zoom without IS these days - and the 55-250mm is the cheapest one you can get. I got one just recently and I'm very happy with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisjb Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I`d agree with a lil extra try the new 55 250 IS, more manageable FL with the x1.6 bodies :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natwinston Posted June 4, 2008 Author Share Posted June 4, 2008 thanks so much everybody for your input i'll check out the tamron and maybe i can budget in one of the others for a fathers day gift. i really do appreaciate everyone's time thanks :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now