Jump to content

180mm Sonnar + ??mm tube for close up portraits?


antipov

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I am thinking about buying a portrait lens, 4.0/180mm Sonnar and wonder which

macro tube I will need for close up portraits, I want to get something like this:

 

http://www.stephanvanfleteren.com/gallery_portraits/images/01012.jpg

 

And the second question is how much vignetting on the focusing screen I will get

using this lens on old 500c or (I hope to buy soon) 500cm body? Both of them

don't have that Gliding Mirror system, so there is supposed to be some cut off on

top of the image. Is it completely cut off, or just darker than the rest of the picture?

 

Dmitry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"how much vignetting"? Almost a cm. and it will be solid black. But just learn to live with it. It's OK. However, if you use a Proxar in stead of an extension ring, there is no cut off at all, nor is there need for exposure compensation.

 

The close-up crop you're looking for could be achieved with anything from 120mm and longer. A popular combination for decades was the 250mm with 21mm extension ring, providing a fairly good distance range, from the tight crop in the example you've shown, to this portrait by a friend, who told me he used that lens/extension combination at maximum distance, and shut down for maximum depth of focus. http://askerbk.com/Medlem%20Olav%20H.html

 

For the very selective focus, of course the 180 f4 may be slightly better than the 250mm at maximum aperture f5.6. But even a really good 250mm C will be a whole lot cheaper than the 180mm CF and later.

 

Cheers, Jenny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answer Jenny,

 

I don't think I'll use Proxar, because it softens the picture pretty much as every close-up filter.

I want to buy a 180mm lens, because 250mm seems to me a little too long, and dark, I want to shoot sometimes handheld and 4.0 aperture would be of great help.

Also I don't want to buy a C lens, because each of them is at least 25 years old, and I won't be able to buy a lens after testing it, i. e. I will be ordering it online from ebay/keh because I live in Israel.

 

I'm interested which extension tube would give me that tight crop or even tighter with 180mm lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello David,

 

Unfortunately I can't view this picture, it appears to be in a friends-only part of your flickr. I'd really appreciate it if you posted a picture somewhere I could see it. Thanks.

 

May be you have an example of portrait on the closest focus distance with that 21 tube?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 180 mm, without extra tube, has a minimum field of view of about 37 cm (with a 0.6 stop light loss).<br>The lens itself has about 27 mm of extension built-in (focusing mount) so a good tube to have with this lens would be slightly shorter: the old 21 mm tube. This combination reduces the minimum field of view to about 21 cm wide (losing 0.9 stops).<br>If that is not close enough, the 32 mm tube will reduce it even further to approximately 17 cm (losing 1.1 stops).<br><br>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question and related questions comes up frequently. That's why you are admonished to use the search function.

 

Review the Hasselblad white paper (http://www.hasselbladusa.com/media/b257f2b0-cd24-497b-b21f-47dcf6ee295a-Closeup.pdf) which will tell you nearly everything you need to know (for your next question too).

 

Focusing distance is not a very useful parameter. Hasselblad organizes its tables by the object size, which allows you to choose the correct lens and extension tube at a glance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...