dave_anton Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 Has anyone ever shot landscape with a 155mm lense for 8X10? I am interested in shooting landscapes and I was wondering if 155 was too wide for the subjects lingering around infinity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_yates Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 If you were shooting 35mm in the same circumstances, same subjects etc., would you be pleased with the results from a 25 mm lens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_glickman Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 The Scheider Super Symar XL 150mm is probably the sharpest LF lens made and it easily covers 8x10. Its image circle is 386mm. I highly recommend it. I use it more often on 8x10 then any of my other lenses for the same format. However, you must buy the ND center filter, preferably from Schneider. The darkening is very severe, the filter takes another 1 1/3 stops away, oh well.... best of luck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shambrick007 Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 Unless I was doing a "near-far" type of shot, I don't know I I would shoot the typical landscape with the equivalent of a 21mm lens in 35mm fromat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon3 Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 The 155mm 6.8 Rodenstock Grandagon easily covers 8x10 and, at infinity, has 50mm of shift and 42mm of rise (382mm circle). <p> A center filter is available and is probably needed by most users but you should determine that yourself. <p> We have also had reports of users who use the 115mm 6.8 Grandagon on 810. While this lens only covers 291mm it still fills almost all of an 810 and easily does 10" wide panoramics on 810 film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chad_jarvis1 Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 In my usual budget-oriented way to respond:<br><br>The Wollensak Velostigmat Series III 6.25" 8x10 W.A. provides ample coverage for 8x10. It's available in two flavors: f/12.5 and f/9.5. I have the latter, but I hear the former is a "better" lens. This uncoated lens, usually mounted in a Betax #3 shutter, can often be found in the $150-200 range.<br>It is certainly not too wide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tito sobrinho Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 Hi, David: I have the Nikkor-SW 150mm f8, Copal #1.It is a "big mamma" with a image circle of 400mm at f22.Covering power of 106 degrees at f22. Filter size of 95mm (have to use my 8x10 dark slide a la lens hood without vignetting -Technique learned in 1973 at A. Adams workshop).I have beautiful 8x10 contact prints without using a center filter. (Lucky?). CHAD, the 12.5 Wollensak version follows the Metrogon & Topogon design.(2 menisci in 2 groups). My 9.5 like yours was a modification from the former i.e the insertion of an buried thin negative element into the central airspace. Which one is better? I do not know. Best, Tito Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shigehiro_ishii2 Posted October 17, 1999 Share Posted October 17, 1999 As Tito says, I didn't have to use a center filter with my Nikkor SW 150mm f/8. It was really sharp lens, however, this focal length was too wide for me (8x10), so I sold it. Instead I bought 210mm Angulon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_urban5 Posted October 21, 1999 Share Posted October 21, 1999 The Schneider 110 XL and 150 XL lenses both cover 8x10. The 110mm is a little smaller and lighter for field work. However, if you use the 110 you will probably want to get the graduated neutral density filter for it, so you minimize the vignetting on 8x10. <p> I have both lenses and the 110 is sharper. Plus, you'll have greater depth of field at a more open f-stop if you use it. The downside is that unless you like the vignetting effect - and it does look good on certain types of compositions - you need the special filter.... more $$$$. Also, movements will be more limited than with the 150mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now