brooke_moore Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 DWF any experiences with this group? Is it worth the price? I am trying to sort it out and see if there is value there. Thanks Brooke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gina_marie1 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I signed up in Dec for a 6mo membership to evaluate. Gotta say I made my money back quickly, happened to join right when YSI album design software was offering 50% off to all members (didn't know about this as it's only advertised to members). Saved a couple hundred bucks but so far there has been quite a bit of value just reading over archives. Got tips for our first bridal show and all sorts of business related info. So far I find it very helpful as a resource for running the business. I personally find photo.net more helpful when I am in need of technical advice though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant g Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Subscribing for other answers... I did the trial membership, but it didn't seem long enough to get me hooked... For me, I think the best selling point is that it is not open to the public and it should be easier to discuss sensitive issues that won't show up on a google search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twatkinson Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 love love love it! so much info, so many great people that honestly want to help you get better (as a photographer and a business person). So worth it. Try DWF Start for a while (free) then get the free trial membership. Once you get a feel for how much info is really on there, you see how affordable the membership price really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 The discounts and business and purchase offers to members are suitable only residents of the USA (all that I have encountered thus far). DWF commentary is more USA centric (and obviously Wedding centric), than Photonet, which has a wider compass in both regards. The first point above, I assume, is of benefit to you, at least for you to know about them: the second I am not sure, I see it a benefit in regards to a local market perspective. In regard to `sensitive issues`, mentioned previously, it is my opinion that if the issue is so sensitive that it requires such intimate details be declared which identifies the inquirer and the subjects of the question for an accurate answer: then such a question should not be asked on ANY forum, but only of a confidant, and in private and face to face. Note that Photonet Administrators will post a sensitive question on behalf of a member, if requested. Also perhaps it is better for business people to join any on line forum with a membership name divested of their business name and its links. As a general recommendation for outlaying your business capital, I suggest you consider purchasing a subscribing to Photonet first: for the small annual fee Photonet asks, it is much better value for money, IMO. WW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisa h Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 It is worth much more than the price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedding-photography-denver Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I enjoy it. Fun place to visit and chat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djphoto Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Member since 2003. What Lisa said -- it is worth much more than the price. If I could belong to only one forum, it would be the DWF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas lee Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Joined a month or so ago. So far, I have found it to be a good investment. Lots of useful information and very helpful members. (Photo.net has that, too!) I agree photo.net has the edge in technical information, but when it comes to wedding specific, DWF is very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_sokal___dallas__tx Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I've been a member for almost 3 years. I agree with Dave, if I could belong to only one forum, it would be DWF. I attended the DWF convention this year in Tampa and it was a fantastic experience. I disagree with William W (retired) about it being USA centric. A large percentage of the participants are from foreign lands, especially UK and down under. I do agree it's probably English language centric. All ten of the top wedding photographers in the world, at least according to some famous magazine, are active participants in the forum. Imaging having one of them comment on one of your photographs. What is that worth to you to have the opinion of the best in the world? Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 >>> I disagree with William W (retired) about it being USA centric. <<< (PS) Thanks for that comment. I am aware of a few: but it seems by first impressions are now out of date. I should revisit it. Thanks again, I appreciate you mentioning my comment directly, to ensure I would pick it up. Regards, WW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Been a member for years. It's not a competition between this site and the DWF. Both are good sources of shared information. The DWF split their site so beginners could have a place to go and get basic information while the more established shooters don't have to wade through countless redundant questions in the pro forum. I've gone one of their conventions and it was very well done and well attended. People from all over the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrace Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Been a member since 2004. Love it. What Marc said. Don't find it US centric. Many UK members. And you can edit your posts.. This forum has an 80s feel to it. Can't edit posts, new posts don't move a thread up, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooke_moore Posted February 26, 2008 Author Share Posted February 26, 2008 Thanks Seems like my PhotoNet pals will be there too. Brooke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon_schmidt Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Tons of usefull information and it is in direct competition with photo.net. Since joining I only venture here occasionaly to make sure I didn't miss anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou korell Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 I have been a member of DWF since 2003 and it is probably the best place anywhere to discuss and learn about all aspects of professional photography and photo technologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marv_stasak___southfield__ Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 I belonged, then dropped it. There is valuable info there, but the forum topics often seem to run on forever with a lot of redundancy. There seems to be little control by moderators and subjects tend to be discussed ad infinitum. Forums can be informative and helpful, but they can also eat you alive in terms of time spent. That said, the DWF does provide some great services. Last year, for example, the DWF was instrumental in exposing Bella Pictures' unethical practices and more or less forced Bella into acknowledging what they had done and at least pay lip service to mending their ways. I'm not sure that could have been done in any other place short of lawsuits. That was a good thing for all of us. In the end, I guess it's up to the individual as to how they want to spend their time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_s. Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 I agree with Marv, there's a lot of redundancy on dwf and the same subjects keeps coming up. From a technical point of view I think photo.net is better, especially the specific forums here like the Nikon Forum etc. But the business, art and portrait sections on dwf are pretty good. Still I don't think I will renew. Forums takes lots of time, time that could be better spent actually shooting something :) Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
picturesque Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Overall, I value my membership, but I find the egos slightly bigger there, and like all pro-clubs, you can end up "talking to yourself" and contending with cliques. Nature of the format, however, and the rest of it can be quite informative and helpful, professionally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now