ekovisions Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Hi folks, I'm at the point where I want to start scanning in my old 35mm negatives andslides (no MF). My goal is to have good files for web inclusion and for smallerenlargements; my understanding is that for big enlargements, I'd really need togo to an (expensive) drum scan. I'm totally guessing here, but I probably haveabout 200 images I *really* want to scan, but I expect that this will escalateto about 2000 or so that I'd like to scan. Wondering if the time and hassle will be worth the additional flexibility ofdoing this myself. My time is short (full time day job), but I'm not made ofmoney either. Worried that someone else might damage my originals as well. Anyone been down this road recently with their own cautionary tales? Thoughts? Thanks,Kellywww.ekovisions.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron_lam Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I scanned over 200 images myself... what a PAIN IN THE REAR! Dust... waiting for the scanner... it wasn't a fun process. If there is any way for you to afford it... I'd say have someone else do it. I just saw this... I am no affliated with them in any way... I posted their link on another thread... but I am dying to try them myself. At these prices... seems worth it to try a few images and see if you are happy. aaron www.scancafe.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I use these guys: http://photoandsoundsaving.com/ Disclaimer, the owners are related to me. But that still wouldn't excuse bad work in my book. Photos are important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 If you only have 200 slides to scan, I would recommend using a quality scanning service. If you have 2000 to do, do it on your own. You'll need a film scanner with a multi-slide loader feature so you don't have to sit in front of the scanner the whole day. I have a Coolscan 9000 which can do 5 slides in a batch, that allows me to do other things in between batches. Five slides take about 25 minutes for a 4000 dpi 4x scan. You'll also need to make a scanner color profile so you don't have to fine tune the level and color curve slide by slide. Just scanned the following photo over the long weekend. I probably did about 100 of them.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stock-Photos Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Nikon film scanners tend to hold their value well if you buy new, and sell it after use. I highly recommend the Nikon 5000. http://www.slidescanning123.com/tips/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I scanned mine at 4000 dpi, 4 passes, with ICE post processing. The multi-pass takes time. For slides with a lot of dark area, like the one above, I scanned it with 8 passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photography by a.f. smith Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 It all depends on if you think you'll enjoy scanning and what your concept of a smaller enlargment is. I like scanning myself because of the extra control, though it can be time consuming and I wouldn't think twice about printing 11x14 from a 35mm scan I did myself. (Provided the film was a low iso.) I'd say if you think scanning may be fun and are willing to put the time into it, you won't find the quality of a dedicated film scanner particularly limiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diane_madura Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Michael Wang, I have an Epson V700. I am interested in knowing how you did mulitple scans. I use Epson's software to scan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Here are three photos. The first one shows the whole frame. The yellow rectangle shows the zoomed in area used by the next two photos. The zoomed in color photo (#2) shows a 1 time scan vs an 8 time scan. Judge for yourself which one is which one. The third photo (#3), a black and white one, is the blue channel layer of photo# 2, which has the most noise among the three channels. Again, judge for yourselves. The bottom line is multi-scan gives you a bit more detail and less noise, but it doesn't do miracle also.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Here's the zoomed in color one.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Here's the third one, in B&W.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inspiration point studio Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Diane, third party scanning software like vuescan can support multiscan on certain scanners. Check their web site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck_french1 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 You start doing your own, then you do your brothers or sisters, then you get the rest of the family. Now you have a suitable archive. It is great fun. I have scanned about 13,000 spanning 60 years and many different types of film. Scan them big, you can always convert to jpgs later. The scanning equipment holds its value, though you are likely to continue to scan enough to make it worthwhile to keep it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now