Jerry_ Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 In overcast weather, here are a pair of images. One taken with the AF-S 10.5mm f2.8G Fisheye-Nikkor, and one taken with the AF-S 18-135mm DX Nikkor [at 18mm.] No question, but maybe a help for those looking to get a wide-angle lens for a DX-sensor Nikon digital body.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_arnold Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 10.5mm is one of nikon's sharpest, but this comparison shows its limitations. you really need to set up the fisheye in terms of framing the image. i actually like your 18-135 pic better from a compositional standpoint. the foliage in the first pic is distracting, while the second puts more emphasis on the bridge extending to the horizon line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_k6 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Thanks for the post Gerald. I always wanted to know how much wider the 10.5 would be compared to 17 or 18mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_williamson6 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I got the opportunity to use a Sigma 10-20mm lens. I used it to take pictures of sculptures around a city. It was GREAT for getting the entire piece of artwork in the frame yet removing the background clutter. I had to really think about the composition of the image and had to work to find a suitable view point, but it was worth it. I opened it up wide and got really close to the artwork. That eliminated most of the distortion and got the whole piece in frame. The Sigma 10-20mm is on my short list of desired lenses. There is definitely a difference between 10 and 18mm in lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam zyto Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I picked up the Nikon 10.5 this month and have really enjoyed it a great deal. Certainly not for every situation but for a shot like the one below, this lens does the job.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayak203 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Nice shots. I also picked one up this month and it's fun for occasional use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juanjo_viagran Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 nice post, but don't think the 10.5mm is AF-S, but I wish it was.. ;) Here is some shots I just took with the 10.5mm 2.8, 14mm 2.8 and 18mm 2.8 indoor.. 10.5mm 2.8 <img src="http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc112/Juanjo_Viagran/BS/_DSC0008-1.jpg"> 14mm 2.8 <img src="http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc112/Juanjo_Viagran/BS/_DSC0011-1.jpg"> 18mm 2.8 <img src="http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc112/Juanjo_Viagran/BS/_DSC0012-1.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liljuddakalilknyttphotogra Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 I picked up the 10,5 over the summer when my nephews came for a visit. It's a sharp & fun lens, but care has to be taken where feet, shadows etc are located. I had lots of fun with it for the month they came to visit. Lil http://lilknytt.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p211320327-2.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now