johan_de_groote Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 I have just received some photos from the lab and I have the impression that they almost all have shake to some extend. Now those were made with a Kiev 60 handheld with Portra 400 inside a church on a bright day. Not bright summer day, but bright autumn. Also not a very dark church. Most were at 1/60 and 1/125. Lenses used were 50-65-80. Now I have been thinking about a monopod. Lugging a tripod is impossible on holyday as we're on the move the whole day. Also a lot of places forbid the use of a tripod inside just like they forbid flash (which I don't like for other reasons). But I don't see how you can get any stability with a monopod! If handhold, you can in theory move in all directions, but practially you are swaying on your feet and your neck. This is about the same as a monopod, only there due to construction you are by definition moving on the surface of a sphere. As I see it, this is only marginally better than handhold. Am I missing something and can good stability be achieved with a monopod and is it down to technique? (and I don't want to go to 800 either this will be problematic outside in the summer (and taking a second body is just a no-go)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAPster Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Hi Johan. I am an amaetuer photog but I do have some suggestions you may find helpful. First, if you don't use a tripod, do try to take advantage of **any** stable immovable surface on which you can rest tha camera and/or brace your hands & arms. Second, consider purchasing a small portable tripod 8"-12". That will be much more portable than a full size unit, and is much more discrete in holy settings. Third, I am not familiar with your model camera, but if it will accomodate either a "cable-type" shutter release, OR, if it has a "self-timer" button, you could use either of these to release the shutter while camera is on tripod. That removes your hands from the camera, which should help eliminate any camera shake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Pitch and yaw are the most significant camera motions, and a monopod controls pitch only. It also stops rotation about the lens axis, which is not particularly significant in practice. A monopod also controls the vertical translational mode, but not the other two axes. In short, you gain about 1 stop in camera shake. I have a bean bag ("The Pod" as I recall) which screws into the tripod socket. This is very effective, and either permitted or discrete enough to escape notice. VR/IS is a better solution, if available. The next best thing to a tripod would be a Kenyon Labs gyroscopic stabilizer, which works with any camera and any lens on any platform (including aircraft, ships and boats). If neighbors complain about the whine, just say the it's your heart-lung machine acting up again ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennyp Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 I once said and it has been repeated several times in several places. your sharpest lens is a tripod. use it and enjoy sharp photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawn_kelly Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 I use a tripod, but I would think a monopod would actually help considerably. Yes you can still sway side to side or foward/backward, but in theory you would be removing all straight up and down movements, as well as any down diagonal or up diagonal movements. So instead of ANY direction, your camera would only go side to side or forward or backwards. That seems much better to me. Even then, with the speeds you are shooting at and having a fixed surface to help hold things, you should see considerable improvement.... At least I would think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_leong_lee Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 A monopod is a good compromise. Unfortunately, the mirror slap from a medium format camera is quite strong. Mirror lockup is thus highly recommended. Google for sites that show you how to use a monopod. It works! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_parrott Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 You need to think of a monopod as the third leg of a tripod. YOUR two legs are the other legs. You need to have the monopod out at about a 45 degree angle in front of you, and your legs spread. Just envision a tripod, and that is what you want to look like while using the monopod. I actually am somewhat leaning aginst the monopod when in use. It is NO substitute for a tripod, but can be much better than nothing when conditions demand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy_english Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Hi Johan: I believe a monopod can help a lot. This photo of me was taken by my grandson (he was 4 at the time) with an ETRs on a Bogen 3249 monopod. Using 160 Portra and if memory serves about 1/125 & F11. It's sharp enough for my use. Jim http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v57/Jim.e/zzzzzzz-a.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulrik Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Johan, has your Kiev 60 already received some mirror slap damping refinement? Apart from that a monopod really helps. The movements along the sperical surface (at least forwards and backwards)are a lesser problem than the downward motion that could be induced by pressing the shutter release downwards. Think of the monopod as one of three legs (1 monopod leg, two Johan legs) that produce considerably more stability than a free held camera. Ulrik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jean-louis llech Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 You use a monopod with your two legs as a tripod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johan_de_groote Posted December 22, 2007 Author Share Posted December 22, 2007 Okay, so it looks as if it is a worthy compromise and effective if used correctly (using yourself as the missing legs). I do have mirror lock-up but it feels very awkward handheld. Maybe with a monopod and a cable release this would be a major help. I do try to use stable surfaces around (I have visited churches with a chair in tow :-) ). But this isn't always possible. The gyro stabilisation looks a wonderful solution! I'll try the monopod first however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jean-louis llech Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Johan,<br> the monopod I use has three small legs which can be easily screwed on the bottom.<br> It's a Manfrotto 681B. Look at it on the Manfrotto web site.<br> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_keistler Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 I've been using a monopod at least 25 years with very good results on both 35mm and 6x6. I have a Leitz Tiltall but it's heavy and I'm not in the best of health now. My monopod has a sling and I can just throw it over one shoulder. The trick, and it doesn't take long to learn, is to make your two legs two parts of a tripod and the monopod the 3rd leg. It isn't a cure-all but neither is a tripod. I guess if you're a really shaky individual it won't help. It truly is amazing the number of people who blame photo problems on what can be traced back to camera shake! I also use a quick-attach on the bottom of the camera I'm using (especially the TLR's) and setting up goes very fast. Good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now