kenny_c Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Though I'd share some new work... http://kennethchou.ca/irishhillroad/ ... shot with a M6, Hasselblad 500cm cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Hmm, interesting subject. The only criticism I would have is the first (cover page?) photograph is not as nice as the others and so doesn't fit so well, even though its subject is a logical intro.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry h-l Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Kenny, Interesting subject. And now the photo instructor / critic in me speaking: The photos are overly redundant. A few of the close ups, like the necklace in the tree help break it up, but you need more variety. More verticals? Something with a longer lens? Most are shot at eye level. It looks like it was shot in a very short period of time. Could you go out there when the light is nicer? Or when a burial is taking place? (You could keep your distance and not bother anyone). It just seems like it could be a very "human" story, but it doesn't come across that way, it has more of a landscape feel to it. Maybe that is your intent. You have some lovely images in there, the snow on the pine trees is a favorite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenny_c Posted December 8, 2007 Author Share Posted December 8, 2007 Trying to present more of an experience, there is just as much emphasis on the person talking. I also brought a voice recorder with me and kept close so I can transcribe text later. The idea was just to document not just the place but interaction thats taking place. I do intend on going back when there are events going on. The photographs are redundant due to the interview taking place, I suppose that isnt so obvious? It seems too jumbled if I shot all over the place and transcribed the interview in. It's still an experiment I'm trying with, to give it a more "phenomenological" experience... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_lehrer1 Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 I find that it is EXTREMELY difficult to believe that the pictures were taken with a 500 cm lens. Jerry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry h-l Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Ken, Now that you say you have audio, it makes much more sense. It is very difficult to both at the same time. If you have a good audio track, I would encourage you to go back and try to add some additional images. If you haven't seen it, and you have a good broadband connection, take a look at www.soulofathens.com, it might give you some ideas. Also look at www.mediastorm.org, outstanding stuff. Good luck with the project. Jerry, 500CM is a model number for a H'blad, not the lens length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_503771 Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 I found the presentation well integrated, the writing and pictures together. So the photos didn't appear redundant to me, they just flow with the narrative. And I'm not usually a fan of this sort of thing. But it works on the web site, and would probably work well if configured somehow for a part of an exhibit. Beautiful work! Would like to see other individual photos you've taken, get a better idea of your "range". Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david-m Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Kenny, Really like the work, and imagine it would look great printed very large as an exhibition, together with some audio. Would have liked to have seen similar shots in different seasons though. Thanks. David (UK) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenny_c Posted December 9, 2007 Author Share Posted December 9, 2007 Thanks for the input, I do plan on making small 7x7 books. The work doesnt lend itself to an extensive exhibition I dont think... strikes me as being more of a narrative work than fine art gallery stuff. But perhaps more shooting would change that. cheers k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
35mmdelux Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Ken: There is alot of confusion in the community about "fine art." It is the buying public and the art professionals that ultimately determine what IS fine art and what is so so. Focus on your work and not the label, as you are doing. Regards, Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now