Wisner Technical 4x5 Geared Axis Tilt

[nick_stanislo]

Is this feature useful enough to be worth the extra money? Many thanks for any responses.

[frank lahorgue]

One advantage of the geared axis tilt is that it helps focus short

lenses with the standard bellows. Using the geared tilt, the rear

part of the camera, with GG and film holder, can be moved forward

from the rear standard which allows the lens board to move closer to

the film plane. Please excuse my syntax.

[dan_smith]

It works well enough to be on the early 1900's Century 8x10 cameras.

I think in practice it won't make much difference though. Try to

handle one with it before buying to see if this is worth it to you.

[todd_caudle]

I just sold my Wisner Expedition camera, which had geared rear axis

tilt. It was a nice feature, but not one to base a purchase on. By

comparison, just last night I received my new Ebony RW45 camera.

(yeah, I'm now a member of the club!) No geared axis tilt, but I

gotta say, I like the way the Ebony handles both front AND rear tilts

MUCH better than the Wisner. Not to mention all the other things I

like about it over the Wisner. E-mail me if you have questions about

it.

[bob_moulton]

I chose the technical; field after having tried out a variety of

field cameras, from technika to ebony to wista. The geared axis tilt

is useful for the features someone already mentioned--WA lens use

with standard bellows, but is is also useful for what it was designed

for--rear tilt. You can dial in the tilt easily and surely, altering

focus where needed with one hand and tilting with the other. The tilt

stays put, so you do not need that thrid hand-one to hold the back

and two more to tighten both knobs.

Obviously, others will disagree, since Wisner is not the flavor of

the week camera that is reviewed and touted highnly here and

elsewhere right now.

If you can compare a traditional wisner agst. the tech field before

purchasing, and see how you respond to the geared tilt.

Bob

[david_haynes]

Nick,

 

<p>

 

I have the Wisner Traditional and have had very few occasions

where I wished for the rear axis tilt. I see it as a matter of

convenience, really, as you can do anything that the axis tilt can

do using the base tilting rear standard on the Traditional. The

only thing is, after tilting you must re-focus more with base tilt.

 

<p>

 

It seems that more often than not, I'm using front tilt anyway.

 

<p>

 

I have a good friend who purchased the Technical Field and we

shoot together often. I was really surprised at the added size of

the larger rear standard. I don't think he uses the rear axis tilts

much anymore, although for awhile (before the got a Sinar P

system) he was using it for studio tabletop work and I'm sure

that feature came in handy at times.

 

<p>

 

As other posters have suggested, your shooting style and

technique will let you know if you need the geared axis tilt more

than my opinion or that of the others who've responded.

 

<p>

 

Personally, I think either Wisner style would be a good choice. I'll

have to say that mine, which I bought used 10 years ago, has

taken plenty of abuse and I've NEVER done so much as tighten a

screw. Always works perfectly. And...it's beautiful.

 

<p>

 

Hope this helps.