fc.moreira Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Dear Fiends, I have an HP G4050 flatbed wich I use to scan medium format transparencies in most, and eventually some 35mm also. As everyone knows, flatbeds doesn't make a perfect job on 35mm films. For this reason, I'm considering the possibility of buying a dedicated Nikon Coolscan V ED to scan 35mm. Does the difference in the final result compensate the investiment for an enthusiast amateur like myself? I shall appreciate very much your opinion. Thank you very much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryo Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Since you want to scan both medium format and 35mm, I suggest you look at a used Nikon 8000 / 9000 scanner. These scanners are optimized for the medium format, but handle 35mm also very well. They can produce a true 4000 dpi scan and come with digital ICE for automatic dust spec removal. You can get these for less than $1000 used. I believe if you are shooting medium format, you are so because of the quality images the large negatives can provide. To get the most out of these negatives, a dedicated scanner like the Nikons will blow away what you are getting from a flatbed. Personally, I would not shoot medium format and degrade the final result by using a flatbed scanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now