ernst1 Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 my M4+35summ and me visited berlin for a day traveling to poland. <br> anybody else take their leica to berlin? <br> more of my berlin/poland trip <a href="http://ernst.fastfrank.speedxs.nl/fotoboek.php? pad=images/album/reizen/berlijn-polen-2007/">here</a> <br>comments welkom<br> ernst <br><br> <img src="http://ernst.fastfrank.speedxs.nl/images/album/reizen/berlijn-polen- 2007/fontein-berlijn.jpg"><br><img src="http://ernst.fastfrank.speedxs.nl/images/album/reizen/berlijn-polen- 2007/punk-alexanderplatz.jpg"><img src="http://ernst.fastfrank.speedxs.nl/images/album/reizen/berlijn-polen- 2007/muur2.jpg"><br>berlin wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 Hmmmm. People's feet and backs look the same in Berlin as in Albuquerque :-) For more Berlin, I suggest "The Good German." Noir, B&W, vintage look and sound, incredibly dense story. A grim foil for "Casablanca." Worthy. Much better than reviews. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_German ...also shows how wartime cameras might have been obtained by Allies in Berlin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_amos Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 Ernst, I think the first one is very cool. The thoughts of the human subjects might be revealed in the sculpture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernst1 Posted June 24, 2007 Author Share Posted June 24, 2007 thanks mark and john,<br>@john: although shot from the back i still like the shot because the boy's the center of attention. he's planning on getting the girls in the fountain. (but maybe i like it cause i know the outcome)<br>the feet in the other picture are crossing the former berlin wall. i added a caption but it got a little lost.<br>and for berlin fans i'll add another. please post your berlin shots.<br>ernst<br><br><img src="http://ernst.fastfrank.speedxs.nl/images/album/reizen/berlijn-polen-2007/berlijn.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_higgins3 Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 <center><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/ 1165/620790195_ce94194b72_o.jpg"><br><i> </i></ center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_higgins3 Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 <center><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/ 1389/621417190_74d165e2e9_o.jpg"><br><i> </i></ center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_higgins3 Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 <center><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/ 1366/621417206_1eea7b0593_o.jpg"><br><i> </i></ center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_doering Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 Half of <a href="http://doeringphoto.com/berlin/berlin.html">this</a> is Leica stuff, the other half is 4x5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 Ernst, your B&W looks awfully grainy with slight apparent unsharpness as a result. What film/developer did you use? Were they scanned from prints or directly from the negatives? (This is not a criticism, but a question for information.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutz Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 <center><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/5502023-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4577196-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/2359400-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/1211721-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/1211716-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4200064-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4164667-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4151534-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4131018-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4130992-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4130975-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4114730-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/2870436-lg.jpg"><p> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/4087338-lg.jpg"><p> <i>B/W: Leica analogue - color: Canon digital<p> (Sorry for several reposts...)</i></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernst1 Posted June 27, 2007 Author Share Posted June 27, 2007 thanks Tom, Frank and Lutz for joining in. great stuff, i'm honoured. <br><br> @ Bill: this is scanned TriX400 film develloped in D76. i had problems with some rolls of film that i took to chile and back. they were x-rayed 4 times, at least that's what i think the problem is because the newly bought roll came out fine. i underdevelloped and underexposed a little (it was very cloudy and sunny difficult guestimating the exposure) and i am still experimenting with the developping times (after 4 years...). i also don't have the best scanner(epson perfection 2400 photo). in PS i had to add a lot of contrast and i might have oversharpened them a little wich makes 'm very grainy but i don't dislike the effect (travis inspired). <br> still, i would like to get better at exposeres, get better at develloping and am thinking of getting a superior negative scanner. <br> ernst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now