michael_londarenko Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Hi! As I recall Leica used to produce APO-Summicron-M 90mm f/2.0 ASPH in chrome version between 2002 and 2004 or something like that. From then on this lens is available in black anodized finish only. So, I have two questions. If anybody has an old specifications brochure for the silver and black versions I'm curious to know whether the only difference between the two versions (black or chrome) is weight (and that would mean brass for chrome and anodized aluminum for black) ? Second question is - does anyone know why exactly Leica discontinued chrome version? Was there a problem with it in terms of manufacturing or perhaps it's a pure supply and demand issue and chrome was simply not popular? Thanks in advance, Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Blackwell Images Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 The only difference was the material used (heavier brass vs. lighter aluminum alloy) - I may have a PDF copy of the lens brochure, which includes the weight of each (email me off-line and I will track it down and send it to you). The silver chrome was discontinued because of slow sales and to streamline production of the lens. “When you come to a fork in the road, take it ...” – Yogi Berra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mostly sports Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 What about black paint? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougfromtumwater Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Hi Michael I own the 90AA Chrome and it is a beautiful lens! The weight (620 grams) is higher than the black chrome model but I find the balance fine with my M6TLL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Blackwell Images Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Black paint and silver chrome weigh the same - the same material (brass) is underneath each finish. “When you come to a fork in the road, take it ...” – Yogi Berra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_londarenko Posted May 17, 2007 Author Share Posted May 17, 2007 Bill, That's what I suspected, but I simply wonder if perhaps there is another reason for that, not just because of slow sales. For example problems with precise assembly or reliability issues or anything else of this sort. Brass itself may have gotten too expensive (copper and zinc have nearly quadrupled in price in last decade if I recall correctly). If the finish alone was the problem, they could have just as easily painted the brass version with black paint. You see my point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougfromtumwater Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 I've not heard of any specific mechanical problems with the 90 AA chrome lenses. Mine is smooth as silk after a couple years of use. All Leica lenses made up to at least the late sixties where brass, including the large 90mm Summicrons of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_pfile3 Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 I can't help but think that production costs, both direct and indirect, had some bearing on Leica's decision to remove several chrome lenses from their catalog. Jerry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_londarenko Posted May 25, 2007 Author Share Posted May 25, 2007 Jerry, I'd tend to agree with this, it's most likely a combination of factors. I should get a black version next week, hopefully I'm going to like it. A lot. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now