sphinx1000514 Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 I have a Pentax K10D and I am planning on purchasing a 1:1 macro lens. I would appreciate any advice you have regarding this purchase. Here are my choices: Pentax Telephoto SMCP-D FA Lens (100mm, F/2.8) Pentax SMCP-D FA 50mm f/2.8 MACRO LENS Sigma Normal 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Autofocus Lens for Pentax AF Tamron Telephoto Macro Di Macro Lens For Pentax (90mm, F/2.8) Sigma EX DG Macro Lens for Pentax (70mm, F/2.8) Sigma Telephoto 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro Autofocus Lens for Pentax AF Please let me know which lens you recommend and why. I will mainly be using this lens for macro photography of insects and plants. I am currently leaning towards the Pentax Telephoto SMCP-D FA Lens (100mm, F/2.8). Is this a wise choice, or is it not as good as the some of the other ones listed above? thanks for the help, Nolan Evans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s_brown2 Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 It's pretty hard to find a bad macro lens from the traditional lens manufacturers, so all of the above should have excellent image quality. The Pentax 100mm f2.8 and the Tamron 90mm f2.8 are certainly very good. More important is probably to get the right focal length... a lot of people find that 50mm is too short when dealing with insects, and even 100mm can be a problem. Personally I'd go for the Pentax 100mm f2.8 since it is fairly light and compact. Cheers, S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nealcurrie Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 You might want to shy away from autofocus and try something like the SMC Pentax-A 1:2.8/50mm Macro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewg_ny Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 I have the D-FA 100mm. I don't think autofocus lenses need to be avoided, but most likely you won't want to use AF much, so older manual lenses work well too. If the insects are still alive, you'll probably want the 100mm rather than the 50mm to give you a little better working distance from the subject. As S. Brown said, there really aren't any bad macro lenses here. <P>I'll just throw one more in the mix, though it might be a little harder to find and might be considered a little more exotic: <A href=http://www.voigtlaender.de/cms/voigtlaender/voigtlaender_cms.nsf/id/pa_asan6m4dyb.html>Voightlander SL Macro Apo Lanthar 125mm</A>. Here's a <A href=http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/voigtlander_lanthar_125_25/index.htm>review</A>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afs760bf Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Try to find a Kiron, Lester Dine, or Vivitar Series 1 105mm macro. They're the same lens. Goes 1:1 and can't be beat. But you'll have to use manual focus, which is no big deal for macro. Second recommendation is the Tamron SP 90mm macro. The newer version goes 1:1. The older version goes 1:2. Pretty nice lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_howlett Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 In the March 07 issue of Practical Photography they tested macro lenses. I was planning on getting the Pentax 100mm f/2.8 D-FA. It was rated three out of five stars. The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di was rated five out of five stars, and given a best buy. Looking at the test cards it is very easy to see that the Tamron is sharper, and cheaper. The only other two lenses that got a five out of five were Canon and Nikon lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audun_sjoeseth1 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 Tamron 90 f/2.8 Di is a great lens, superb optically. I had it for my Nikon D200 (AF vas fast with D200), and I'll get it for my K10D. It worked great with a Kenko pro 300 1.4x. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpolaski Posted April 22, 2007 Share Posted April 22, 2007 I use Kiron/Vivitar Series 1 50mm and 105mm lenses. Either one is good. Yes, the 105 length is good for insects, but walking trails, I've found I usually just use the 50mm on my istDS. It's an effective 75mm field of view, and makes excellent other-than-macro shots. Also effective in shady areas where handholding is a bit of a challange.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpolaski Posted April 22, 2007 Share Posted April 22, 2007 And 50mm good for scenics.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddy_macmahon1 Posted April 22, 2007 Share Posted April 22, 2007 Ignore autofocus - go for one of the pentax A series secondhand. Dream buy for insects (especially ones you don't want to have to immobilise with a pin) would be the SMC-A* 200mm f4 macro (although this seems as rare as hens' teeth), but otherwise try to get hold of the SMC-A 100mm f 2.8 macro. Also get an off-camera flash adapter - i have a manfrotto bracket that allows two TTL flashes to be used on either side of the lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tondegoijer Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 Hai, Have used a Panagor 90mm 2,8 M42 lens with original Pentax adapter, with very good results. I just bought a Vivitar 2,5 105mm KA lens, first shots are very promising. Loose the AF as others said as the main use is macro, AF is 'no good' for that there is so much detail you wan't to be in control. Even for portraits it is nice to focus yourselve. I think MF makes you think more about compostion. Ton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now