Jump to content

M7's improved coating of finder window


vc2

Recommended Posts

I think many M6 users will agree, sometimes they have to endure the flare prone problem of M6's finder window when faced a strong light source in front of them.

 

<p>

 

I read a good news from Mr. Puts, that is according to Erwin Puts' M7 review, he said there's a major difference between M7 and M6: "the improved coating of finder window". My question is : will Leica apply this improved coating to the existing production M6/TTL? Or it did already? Then when?

 

<p>

 

If this is really an improved feature, that means Leica knows this is a M6 problem all the time for more than ten year.(M6 has been introduced since 1984!) Why took them so long to materialize the fixing? I have email these questions to both Mr. Puts and Leica. I will post their answer if any.

 

<p>

 

Personally, I have no prejudice to M7. If the so called improvement is true, then I do feel existing M6 users have been mistreated by Leica! That's annoyed me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, VC, Leica KNEW from the start they had a problem with that

window, AND knew how to fix it in 1984, but just waited until now,

just because they wanted to hack you off!

 

<p>

 

According to your illogical argument, no manufacturer should improve

their product, because some bozos will claim they should have had it

already on earlier models, and want free upgrades. Depending on what

it costs, they may, or may not retrofit existing stock. I don't feel

mistreated. Of course, I wish they'd figured it out earlier, but

then so did families of people who died of infections before

penicillin was discovered. Do you think they were "mistreated".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw c'mon... its a no brainer that if you multicoat it, its gonna flare

less. Even my wife's horrible eyeglass perscription, I can now

photographer her and get her eyes in the picture with multicoated

glasses. The old uncoated ones were just horrendous, all flare/glare

no eyes. Lighting was a @#$$#@% now its a breeze!

 

<p>

 

Leitz OUGHT to have known better, we're not talking breaking a lot of

new ground here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alec,

 

<p>

 

I partly agree with you. But my main question is "will Leica apply

this improved coating to the existing production M6/TTL?" If

penicillin was discovered, when will they use it to save life. If

thus, Leica has to raise a bit price on M6/TTL, let's fair. May be

Leica just found the improved coating formula resently. Then my

complain is not so justified. So, will Leica continue to sell M6 with

flare prone finder window. (Remenber change coating is not change

Model! As we know Leica lenses did change coating with the same optic

design.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for my misspelling and poor grammar.

 

<p>

 

Some of my above remark should amend as follows,

"If thus, Leica has to raise a bit price on M6/TTL, that's fair. May

be Leica just found the improved coating formula recently, then my

complaint is not so justified."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about the RF patch flare (I use an M4P, which has essentially

the same VF as M6), but it's not a huge problem. The flare only

manifests itself occasionally, and I can usually get around it by

slightly reaining the camera, It's not as if this were a huge deal.

I think the flare is due, in part, to a condenser lens they removed

some time during the tenure of the M4-2 (apparently, to make room for

the two extra frames 28/75 added in the M4P).

 

<p>

 

My guess is that if they continue producing the M6TTL (rather than

just sell off units already made) they will include the improved VF.

Leica does continue to add improvements to their M5 line even though

they don't publicize it. An example is several improvements in the

operation of the lightmeter, including increased low light

sensitivity (now down to EV-2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read other places that the condenser lens thing has little to do

with the flare. I am hoping to come up with a litte test for this,

when my M4-2 gets back from Sherry.

 

<p>

 

I'm wondering if techs can install the coated part(s) into the RF of

the older camreas. Lets not stop at the M6TTL but all the way back to

the M4-2 later production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had two M4-2 cameras.

 

<p>

 

My first was a late production with the new style of finder which

has the cam plate for vertical alignment and the lens by the

frameline masks removed. No flare at all, performed exactly like

my M2. I sold that M4-2 to finance my M6TTL which introduced

me to rangefinder flare.

 

<p>

 

My second M4-2 is a very early one with the old style screw to

adjust vertical alignment and the lens in front of the frameline

masks. It flares just like my M6TTL.

 

<p>

 

So what causes the flare? Beats me but it is not the missing

lens or modifications to accomodate the M6 meter display.

 

<p>

 

What do I do about rangefinder flare? I centre my eye in the finder

and it disappears. It used to bother me but now I do not even

notice it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a brief e-mail exchange today with Erwin Puts on this

issue. He said that what I thought was coating on the viewfinder

windows of the M6/M6TTL was actually reflections from coating

on the INTERNAL elements of the viewfinder/rangefinder

mechanism. The M7 has coating on the external window panes.

 

<p>

 

Erwin, however, has not responded so far to my follow up

question, which was:

 

<p>

 

One last question about the viewfinder/rangefinder, coatings, etc.

(I'm sorry, but the rangefinder flare in the M6 has become one of

my minor obsessions, since it is a MAJOR annoyance). I can

essentially eliminate the rangefinder flare on my M6 and my

M6TTL's (.58 and .85) by placing a piece of surgical tape over the

illuminator panel. How does coating the external viewfinder

optics decrease or eliminate rangefinder flare if, in my

experience, the flare is caused by, or at least greatly exacerbated

by, the illumination system?

 

<p>

 

Anyone care to take a crack at that one?

 

<p>

 

I suspect (and I hope to find out soon by looking through one)

that the M7 flares in the same way as the M6/M6TTL. If, in fact,

the new coatings have alleviated/eliminated the problem, the

next question will be: how much will it cost to have the new

coated windows installed in my cameras?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leica's Francis Pilet sent an email to me as follows,

 

<p>

 

Quote

 

<p>

 

A subsequent coating of the M6 viewfinder has not been yet scheduled.

Basically it is possible, but shouldn't be cheap!

 

<p>

 

Furthes specs on the LEICA M7 on our homepage www.leica-camera.com

 

<p>

 

Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Kind regards / Salutations / Saludos /

Distinti saluti

 

<p>

 

Francis Pilet

 

<p>

 

Leica Camera AG

Tel.: +49 6442 208 423

Fax. +49 6442 208 425

Francis.Pilet@leica-camera.com

 

<p>

 

Unquote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those of you who are bothered by the uncoated viewfinders on all

the prevoius Ms try this:

http;//www.konermann.net.

Lutz has a great solution called The shade. I have one on each of my

Ms and it does the trick. Focusing is not impaired even when

focusing the Noctilux in VERY dim light.

Check out the slide as well.

Ned learned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here comes Mr. Puts answer:

 

<p>

 

Quote

The coating is on the plane window glass in the front of the cameras.

If such glass is becoming available it can be put on the M6/TTL

versions.

The full solution to the flare problem has not yet found. The coating

is part of the answer, but more is needed before the problem is

tackled.

 

<p>

 

Erwin

Unquote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The full solution to the flare problem has not yet found. The

coating is part of the answer, but more is needed before the

problem is tackled."

 

<p>

 

Thought so.

 

<p>

 

If they hadn't messed with the M4 viewfinder/rangefinder

mechanism in the first place, there wouldn't be a problem to

tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...