tim_hetherington Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Hi. Can anyone suggest the best method to process an image from the Hasselblad CFV. I'm a reportage photographer based in Africa. I've just got the back, but the images seem a little muddy (like the early Canon D10 - D30 images). Marc Williams mentioned that it took him some time to master the best proceedure in using the software. I'm at the beginning of that hill. Any help most welcome. Thanks. Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_moore1 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Tim, I assume that your muddiness is due to the flat nature of your files from the 3F format of the Flexcolor process software....so If you are using Flexcolor 4.5 to process the files. Look at the link to CFV on the hasselbladinfo.com under the CFV Second try from Marc W. concerning process with Flexcolor for the 949 scanner...a similar process I assume for your back...color correction histogram correction and sharpening. Once you output an Adobe 98 Tif 16 bit file import it into PS CS2 CS3 or lightroom. I initially size image and either rotate or crop as needed. Then correct color hue and or saturation. Histograms will be fairly flat I assume so set light and dark points first then slide midpoint to adjust overall light to dark balance...then on to curves to adjust the contrast. If need be clean or spot the image at 200% with the clone and or repair tools at a very small size 8 to 10. Finally sharpening via: Unsharp mask if local contrast needs a boost...unlikely with the CFV more common with strong AA filters like Canon 1DsII Canon 5D etc. Smart sharpen or Photokit sharpener for capture ( My preferred workflow ) Initially having saved as 3F from Flexcolor ( Digital Negative) and then save as TIF at this point. Size again for output...maybe sRGB for Web. Output sharpening now for print or display with Photokit sharpener....save a copy at this point. Wait a week and look at the file...you can probably rerun the workflow and improve the final once you view it afresh. Best of luck it is a great back and should allow wonderful output. Bob Moore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Hi Tim. First of all go to the Hasselblad site and download Flexcolor version 4.6.6. After that, hook up the CFV back to the computer using the firewire cable, and it will update the CFV Back's firmware. If it is a desktop computer you won't need the battery as the computer provides the power. Follow the on screen prompts exactly as stated. The newer Flexcolor versions have improved the ISO 400 performance, among other things. There are two ways to approach processing files from the CFV (or any Hasselblad back). If you are proficient at PSCS2 using the Adobe Camera RAW processor, you can convert the CFV files into DNG files through Flexcolor. Just select all the files, and click on the DNG button and send them to a new folder on your desktop. DNG conversion is pretty fast. Then close Flexcolor and open that DNG folder in Bridge to access Adobe Camera RAW. I do this when processing a lot of shots from different cameras. All the cameras are time coded and I drop all files into one folder and sort by time shot. This puts everything in chronological order. You have to correct one of your shots in ACR, then save those altered Default settings, so all the rest of the shots will have the same settings applied (they'll all change automatically). You can even save this default and label it CFV for future use. If you want to process through Flexcolor (which many, including me, feel produces nicer color than ACR), you will have a host of processing tools available to do so. But first, make sure your output color matches the working color space of your computer. With Flexcolor open go to "File" > "Set-Up" > Colorsync and next to RGB select your computer's working color space and make sure the "Convert" box is checked, and if you want that color space embeded check that box also. If you do not do this, the Hasselblad files will retain their native colorspace which may not look correct on your computer (i.e., muddy) Another thing is remember is that once you make color and exposure corrections you have to go to to the "Modify" button and click on it, then a dialog box opens and you make sure the "Update" box is checked, then click on "Modify" to apply the corrections you just did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ataisa Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Tim: The only thing I can add to the masterful set of instructions given by Bob and Marc is that make sure you do not share memory cards with other digital cameras. If you do and you do not format the card in the Hasselblad digital back you will not be able to retrieve your 3F files using FlexColor. I do not know why it happens but it does. It happened to me and also to a friend who has the same equipment. I used a previously formated card ( I also shoot with a Cannon OS1 DS) the Hassy camera will see the photographs but when you go to FlexCOlor the Import window will not see the shots. Just a word of advise so you do not go through what I did. I lost a bunch of very important photographs. I follow the same steps Marc described in his very well written note Good luck and enjoy. It is a nice piece of hardware. It produces great results. I own the CFV but I have also used the 39 Megapixels with the H3 system. Unless you need big time blow ups there is hardly a difference between them both....other than the price...... A Fridman MD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk Posted February 26, 2007 Share Posted February 26, 2007 See Marc is featured in this month's UK Hasselblad magazine. Nice one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim_hetherington Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 Many thanks to you all. The advice is much appreciated. Tim H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 "Unless you need big time blow ups there is hardly a difference between them both....other than the price." And have a need to use wide angle lenses, and want AF, and want to use the software improvements for distortion and fringing control, and can use 1/800th sync speed ... to name a few other differences : -) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff.grant Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Spot on Marc, the H3D is a completely different beast. I can do many things with it that I would never try on my 503 and V96C combo. It is an incredibly flexible piece of equipment. I'm seriously thinking of ditching my Canon gear now. It's a whole new world being able to bang off 5x4 quality without the pain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now