ray_moth Posted December 6, 2001 Share Posted December 6, 2001 Emile, <p> The point I was trying to make was that Alfie should at least learn the basics before setting "rules" for himself. It may have come across as bullshit to you but it wasn't meant to be. <p> Regards, Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nesrani Posted December 6, 2001 Share Posted December 6, 2001 words fail me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emile_de_leon9 Posted December 6, 2001 Share Posted December 6, 2001 Dear Ray, Why should Alfie have to do anything? He might be given the freedom to be himself whatever that may be regardless of the opinions of others. Does it matter if he evolves photographically or not? Only he can answer that. He can only be where/what he is... like all of us. If he wants to be in a box full of the rules of others thats cool...if he wants to excell at those rules thats cool too...if he wants to do anything at all or not.... its all his personal choice. My calling it bullshit was not meant to be taken personally...sorry about that...it was just my way of putting forth a question of the value of ones own personal education and opinion in regards to the development of another.To teach another can be very tricky business...Obviously if he wants to excell in the "world of photography" he needs to heed your advice... but does he really want this or is he after something else...only he can answer that. Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray_moth Posted December 6, 2001 Share Posted December 6, 2001 Emile, <p> I didn't take your words personally. Alfie said, inter alia, "I am happy to have the photo criticism indeed but I don't feel like people here are interested in providing advice to a young and beginning photographer about improving the shots." That sounds to me like he does want to improve, if not excel, in photography. I therefore responded to his post, instead of veering off at a tangent. <p> Rob, <p> If words fail you, why post? <p> Regards, Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_tai Posted December 6, 2001 Share Posted December 6, 2001 Alfie, I am not going to critize you for expressing your ideas but will critize your ideas instead. Please get yourself into a b&w printing class immediately. People have day jobs so there are night classes for that reason. Once you have tried your best to print a really crappy negative you will begin to think how to take a perfect one. I personally believe good photographic technics begins in the darkroom. The darkroom is where the novice will learn to respect the basics such as contrast and tones. Now unplug the computer, buy a box of Multigrade, a good incident meter and register. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_wiley Posted December 7, 2001 Share Posted December 7, 2001 Emile, I don't think anyone is suggesting that Alfie go get his Master's degree in photography from Yale, only to take a basic photo class or workshop. Photography is a visual language. If you have something serious to say, you need to learn a few words. He said that he wanted this forum to be his online classroom. I'm sure everyone will agree that this isn't the right place to learn about the basics of the craft. I'll second ray's opinion about the darkroom, though. Photography is based on reciprocity and nowhere is it more evident than in the darkroom. Mystical feelings won't help you get a good print out of a negative that's three stops underexposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emile_de_leon9 Posted December 9, 2001 Share Posted December 9, 2001 If Alphie wants more baggage to carry then by all means he or anyone else for that matter can pay the bucks for someone to give them their opinion of what a photograph should be and how they think he should do it. I think though that the development(no pun intended) and fixing(pun intended) of the photographic technique and SPIRIT of THE INDIVIDUAL comes about solely as the photographer shoots and develops and grows his own way thereby.. by himself... with or without a teacher. In reality the photographer teaches himself. All that money spent on a photo 101 class could be spent on an enlarger, paper,film, lens or good books on how to do it...I really think most classes are for the lazy or stupid who want to be spoon fed and/or to maybe socialize...And......Steve I think you have this ass backwards...The spirit drives the good photograph...technique is never the originator. It's VERY important to contact the feeling first then let the technique develop in response to the genuine impulse ....not to act out of greed and become a Adams or HCB clone or some other monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_wiley Posted December 9, 2001 Share Posted December 9, 2001 Emile, Were you somehow traumatized in a Photo 101 class? Why are you so anti-education? I can guarantee you that no student of mine has ever had their individual spirit or personal vision squelched in one of my classes. Remember that photography isn't all light and groovy feelings, it's also about math and chemistry, which some people are uncomfotable with. My goal as a teacher is to make technique become second nature, so the students learn to good pictures effortlessly. And yes there is socializing. It's a classroom of 10-15 people who want to learn about and discuss photography and their experiences with it. My students are busy people. They have careers and families. But every Saturday, they come to class and work for three hours so they can learn to be better photographers. That doesn't sound lazy to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emile_de_leon9 Posted December 9, 2001 Share Posted December 9, 2001 No Steve, I wasn't tramatised by any photo 101 class!I never took one. And...I'm not against education as I have taught music professionally since the age of 16 in N.Y.C. to more recently college and adult level workshops. It's just my experience that most (but not all)college education etc.is just big business..... but occationally a good teacher shows up and the students can have a REAL experience there. But generally in a faculty/college situation the good teachers are few and far between and the mediocre/intellectual is king. Politics is the name of the day and usually the good people get run out or left high and dry by the system.There are exceptions of course but but again these are few and far between.Anyway ....it seems like you actually care about the people you instruct and give them something good to work on!I didn't though hear you mention artistry with the camera as related to the emotions....Is this part of your instruction too or is it just math and chemistry? Its been my experience that so called education is really only headucation...and this really doesn't take the person very far...and by far I mean... ALL THE WAY!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triblett_lungre_thurd Posted February 4, 2002 Share Posted February 4, 2002 how'd I miss this'n? Usually, when someone's talkin' behind my back, well, my hackles stand up and I taste bile... <p> must be gettin' old... anyhow, thanks for the kind words, <p> you sissies... <p> me <p> p.s. to alfie... I like ya kid, say it with humor and you've really got something there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now