simon_wong Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 Well I'm on the brink of a Summilux 35 Asp. purchase. Wonder who has one and likes it, and who had one and sold it? And why of course :-) <p> Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_. Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 I've got one and I can't say enough great things about it. I used to have a Summicron-ASPH, but sold it for the LUX when I started using a Tri-Elmar, because the LUX has a 3-stop advantage. I only use it in low-light situations. I bought mine used, it wasn't that much more than the Cron is new, plus it shares filters with my 90/2.8. The performance of the Cron and Lux ASPH's is so similar that unless the money is the only consideration, the Lux is the definite way to go. Even in size and weight, there isn't much difference, not like comparing the Lux to a pre-ASPH Cron. I've still got my Canadian pre- ASPH if I need a really tiny lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kens Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 The 35 Summilux ASPH is my primary M lens. It's the one I wouldn't do without. Performance in color & B&W are unsurpassed. It's a little larger than the Summicron, but the extra stop, and comparable performance wide open, are worth it. I often pair it with the Tri-Elmar, too, or a 21, 75, or 90 (get the idea it's a flexible lens?). For me the Summilux is the primary lens, and the others come along for the ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackflesher Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 They are both GREAT LENSES! I sold my Summicron asph for a Summilux asph. 'Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_simon Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 I've had mine for almost 4 years now & thinks it's the best lens I've used, by far! I recently added a .85 TTL and finding the viewfinder cutoff a pain, I'm using an accessory 35mm viewfinder. It's great, especially if you prefocus and set your exposure in advance. <p> Enjoy! <p> P.S. <p> This is my first contribution; the website is great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_chefurka Posted July 18, 2001 Share Posted July 18, 2001 Here's another vote for the Summilux ASPH. I bought the Summicron ASPH first (because it's all you really need, right?), then got the 'lux. Six months later the Summicron went on the block. Like many others here, it's my primary lens. I team it with a 3E and a 90 AA for most of my shooting. <p> I don't find it much heavier than the Summicron, and that extra stop is sooo useful. <p> It's a wonderful lens, pin-sharp at every stop, quite resistant to flare, fantastic colour rendition - a true general-purpose lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_laurence Posted July 19, 2001 Share Posted July 19, 2001 Hi Simon, <p> About the 35mm Summilux Asph, I'm seriously disapointed when I have to stop down to f/1.8 or f/2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_wong Posted July 19, 2001 Author Share Posted July 19, 2001 Thanks for all your responses guys! I think I'm going to take the plunge and join the club. It's the price that's won me over. My user lens is offered to me at $1250. Only fault are factory gluespot residue on the outside edge of the 2nd element-outside the light path. Can't loose here I think. <p> I'm curious about your post Martin. How is it possible 2 35mm lenses have different DOF at the same aperature? <p> Also Eric, what specifically are you disappointed about at F1.8 and F2 and compared to what? <p> Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_laurence Posted July 19, 2001 Share Posted July 19, 2001 Simon, <p> I really love the shallow depth of field wide open, 90% of my pictures are taken at f/1.4. Dont take my previous post as negative comment on lens performance. This is my desert island lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roberto_watson_garc_a Posted July 19, 2001 Share Posted July 19, 2001 Can you be more specific Eric, I´m also interested in knowing more about this lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nesrani Posted July 19, 2001 Share Posted July 19, 2001 "I sold it because of the lack of depth of field at f2 compare to the summicron. it is heavy lens." <p> Martin, surely DOF field for the two lenses at the same aperture will be exactly the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_laurence Posted July 20, 2001 Share Posted July 20, 2001 M. Watson, <p> I work with several formats (Mostly Leica and Hasselblad, I dont use the Linhof much lately). Each format as it limitation so what I do with one is always pretty different from the other. I use the Leica to take pictures the same way my eyes see the world. When I look at another person, I look at her in the eyes. At that moment, the only thing in focus his her eyes, that is why I always do wide open shot with fast lens in 35mm world (I do casual portrait of the people close to me and I keep a visual diary of my surrounding). The extra stop make a huge difference in DOF at close distance or for camera shake at low speed. I leave the "HyperfocalTripodCableReleaseSpiritLevel" (F/64 mentality) to the other format. Buy the Summilux only if you plan to use the extra stop (Heck, I slow Tri-X to 50asa E.I. to be able to use the lens at f/1.4 in sunny condition!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_smith3 Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 I have had my 35 asph lux for about 5 years now. A great lens, many of my images taken with this lens have a nice glow about them. <p> Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now