michael s. Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 for <a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NAKED_PHOTOGRAPHER?SITE=TNMEM&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>obvious reasons</a>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen hazelton Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 "He would jump naked out of bushes in front of women and take pictures of their shocked expressions." That sounds like a neat book idea...(assuming the women in question weren't laughing)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_.1 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 ROFLMAO!!! TOO FUNNY! Clearly I would not hire this guy to represent me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_thorlin Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Did he use long exposures or was it just p&s ? What a wonderful world we live in ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Did he use a single stroke or dual stroke... M3 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 With an IMARECT 35mm finder.... http://www.ncad.co.jp/~komata/leica3b/imarect-up.jpg Oo-er matron! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roland_schmid Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 It's Al's new project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damir_fajdetic Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 That's one of worst articles I've read - there's absolutely nothing about the cameras, lenses or films he used, nor a word about focusing and exposure methods! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h._p. Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 So that's what it takes to get a lawyer put in prison. I must have a word with my local hypnotist..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erin.e Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Obviously a Nikon or Canon user, "Jumped out of the bushes naked" indeed. A self respecting Lieca owner would stroll out in an urbane manner, and any erect parts would be caused by the camera alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erin.e Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Obviously a Nikon or Canon user, "Jumped out of the bushes naked" indeed. A self respecting Leica owner would stroll out in an urbane manner, and any erect parts would be caused by the camera alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_bennet Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 ...and the bush surrenders another naked Republican... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
summitar Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Did he display his shortcomings? Is that a telephoto lens or are you just happy to see me? Was he using a monopod? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_sarsfield Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I suspect that all his images were OVEREXPOSED and UNDERDEVELOPED... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy m. Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 A lot of humorous posts here. It does seem funny/absurd but we shouldn't lose sight of just how frightening and upsetting that type of behavior is. I suspect that the victims still have trouble seeing the funny side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_r._fulton_jr. Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 <I>nothing about the cameras, lenses or films he used, nor a word about focusing and exposure methods!</I><P>'Seems like there was plenty about his "exposure" methods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rj Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 The real question is not how long the lens was, but how wide the front element is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark-j Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 A polarizing filter might have helped to cut the glare. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I hear he's up for an NEA grant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rj Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Figures. The question is if the grant will be for performance art or photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_doyle Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Maybe he can counsel Scooter in the big house... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maciek_eyman Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Tried to google his site but no success. Works still unpublished, it seems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan flanders Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 What about the bokeh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_bach2 Posted November 1, 2005 Share Posted November 1, 2005 I will sign up if he run a workshop. www.micbach.dk........"Photography workshops in Spain" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now