grahams Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I have been trying my luck with a Jessops 100 film and Rodinal, without much success, despite encouragement from Paul Headland. These are from my first attempt, shot with the Kiev 4AM and the J8. Forgive the poor quality, but the negs are thin and contrasty and were difficult to scan.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahams Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 **<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahams Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 ***<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacsa Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Where is this, UK? From the half-timbered house i would have thought it's swhere northern germany or scandinavia...but the names don't fit:) Nice results. Hows'it with the "contax grip", that is, Kiev grip in this case, does it work for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vidom Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 What's wrong with the results? They look better to me than most b&w scans published in this forum, including some of my own. From my wet darkroom experience I must say that I prefer thin contrasty negs, they are easy to print as long as there is still detail in the shadows. Your mileage may vary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anupam Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 These scans look more than okay to me. Nice shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_mcbride Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 These shots look great on my monitor, Graham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_lai Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I received some advice <a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00CG3D" target="_blank">here</a> earlier that the published times for Rodinal are too long and results in negs that are too contrasty. Sadly, it might be a waste of time and effort to perfect your use of Rodinal given that Agfa Photo will be history in a few months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrea_ingram1 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Graham, Real nice images. Considering this is 35mm, these look just fine for Rodinal in my limited experience. Wish I could do as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian blacklaw richardson Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 These are very nice shots Graham and let's continue to use Jessop's B/W because, who knows? we may need such film in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenotar28 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Those shots look darned good to me. No reason to apologize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahams Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 Thank you all - I appreciate your comments and compliments. The negs just don't look to me like what I am used to in a "good" neg. No richness, no highlight density or detail - in lab-speak, I would say that the D-Max was off two points or more. Even the rebate markings look thin. I will persevere after I prove that my bottle of Rodinal is not at fault by processing some FP4. Csab - Yes, this is in the U.K. - we have many old half-timbered houses still, most are "listed" and cannot be altered in any way. This one is about 30 kms from London, near where I live. If you live in one, it is said that the furniture will never go in another house, because the legs have to be cut to match the un-even floors which are not level. If you go to sleep in one corner of the room, you wake up in the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahams Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 Csab, the "Contax Grip" is a pain in the a**! I can never remember to use it instinctivly - maybe I don't use the Kiev enough. The infinity lock catches me out more, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan flanders Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I've been using my Kiev almost exclusively (except for business photos where I use a digital) for the past year or so and I just can't seem to adapt to the bifurcated grip necessary if the wheel focus is in use. Neither have I adapted well to the infinity lock, but maybe time will help. Anyhow, I am quite satisfied withe the Jupiter 53mm f2. Nevertheless, having used Leicas for nearly sixty years perhaps it is an isue of time over matter -- and matter it is, it seems to weigh a ton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
summitar Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 If these are disappointing results, I can't wait to see what you consider to be acceptable. They looked great to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gene m Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 They look damn good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now