chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 This is my list of the special places that inspire multiple rolls of film being exposed in a somewhat ordered way: <p> 1. Angkor Wat near Siem Reap, Cambodia by far is in first. A MUST see. <p> 2. The Grand Canyon <p> 3. Granada, Spain (Al Alhambra, Sacramonte) <p> 4. Segovia, Spain (Roman Aqueduct) <p> 5. Rome, Italy (Roman Ruins) <p> 6. Djemila and Timgad, Algeria (Roman Ruins near Constantine) <p> 7. Paris (people, places and THE Tower) <p> 8. NYC (The Brooklyn Bridge, skyline, and people) <p> 9. Bilbao, Spain (The Guggenheim Museum) <p> 10. The Great Wall (Badaling and Mutanyue) <p> 11. Hong Kong Skyline (especially from Victoria Peak and the ferry) <p> 12. In and Around San Fransisco <p> 13. Last But Not Least, Auschwitz <p> On The List: <p> 1. Machu Pichu <p> 2. The Great Pyramids <p> 3. Chichiniza (sp?) <p> 4. Greece <p> 5. Turkey <p> 6. Tunisia <p> 7. The National Parks in southern Utah. <p> I like people (street), landscape, architecture, particularly ruins (history of great civilizations). <p> Any More Ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alec1 Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 And this has WHAT to do with Leica, Chris. Can't you take your travelog somewhere else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon_terry Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Couldn't help but notice that most (all?) of the places you list are on that list simply because they're "photogenic". Also couldn't help but imagine the resulting pile of "gee, nice pic" postcard shots. OK I admit I'm a DAH brown noser but one of the things he emphasized when I took a workshop with him was to start in your own backyard. When the ordinary and everyday begin to inspire multiple rolls, then you're ready to go out into the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon_terry Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 And no, I don't think I'm ready to go out into the world... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 WHY the Aggressiveness? <p> It has to do w/Leica because it's what I use. Leicas make a great travel kit because of its compactness, if not light weight. <p> I just wanted to add some nice places that are not out of the reach of most of the people within this forum to consider when nearby, and wanted similar recommendations. <p> Thats All. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Also, I have little choice wrt to my employer on where/when/why to go "into the world" w/o changing companies. I find myself particularly lucky for the opportunity. Exploring the world forces one to explore themselves. <p> And, exactly what is wrong about photogenic places? Yes, I admit to looking at the postcards even if I have a local along with (friends worldwide and am better for it) for ideas, but I NEVER try to duplicate them. <p> You are missing a lot, cultural differences are photogenic within themselves. <p> The post was not to brag, I was requesting other DON'T MISS photogenically places other people have been because I'm bound to be nearby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Anon, <p> This really surprises me considering my previous posts. <p> I DON'T have a "permanent" back yard, and I did go cycling around my current back yard to find photogenic opportunities. It was nice, but I didn't finish a roll, so it didn't make the list. <p> I could've shot much more, but I try for ALL "keepers". <p> I'm flabergasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Another point, <p> It's definately NOT a travel log; one would need a great deal of time to go through MY travelog. It's just the hightlights. <p> Never a flame from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Sorry Gang, a Small Flame Please, <p> What's **** got to do with Leica, as well. As I remember, he/she abandoned Leica recently. <p> So Sorry Folks, but I thought the comments hostile, not knowing anything about me and my experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_.1 Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Well...some here are so hung up on equipment, rather than going on adventures and capturing some of it photographically, that they would rather not hear it. Anyway, Machu Picchu sounds nice. How about Ireland? Kauai? Big Island. And, why do some criticize others' choices for what to photograph? To me, one should photograph that which interests them, not what others would like to see. Throw my Leica into a hole when I worry more about what others want to see on my photos. A means to an end, remembering where we've been on this planet with a Leica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn_travis Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Chris, do yourself, and the rest of us a favor, and shutup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_.1 Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 *boohoo* NO you SHUT up hahaha...wooooo am I in grade school now? rofl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_tai Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Chris, I tried e-mailing you privately but it bounced. I will be in Angkor Wat in two weeks and have been struggling with lenses/format to bring. Do you recommend more on the wide angle side or the tele side? My choices are either a Rollei 6008i, 645 back, 50mm and 90mm lenses, or R8 with 19mm, 28mm, 50mm and 100mm. Tripod of course. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Thanks for your support James, I almost ran out of tissues "boohooing". 8*) <p> Still waiting for productive suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_.1 Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Maybe on the forum in photo.net you will find more (and more well- rounded perhaps) suggestions on places. Not all Leica users are as dashing or adventuresome as others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon_terry Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 <i>What's **** got to do with Leica, as well.</i> <p>About as much as your post does. So we're about on even ground, no? <p><i>As I remember, he/she abandoned Leica recently. </i> <p>So, what... that disqualifies me from posting in this forum? That is elitism at its worst. <p><i>not knowing anything about me and my experience. </i> <p>How is the air up there on your high horse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Chris, I agree with you that Leicas make excellent travel partners. Carried mine all over the world. Carried not lugged. As far as the "gee wiz post card" comment made, it'll look that way if you shoot it that way. Leicas do make you think a bit more, and often lead to a new take on a cliche' subject. One idea that's led to just such an unusual look at overly exposed sites for me has been going there when its off season or shooting at unusual times. I photographed in the Arizonia desert in 122 degree heat , and in the Sedonia area mystic mountains in the rain. The Ranger said it hadn't rained there in 120 days! Waterfalls gushing down red rock into pools near tribal caves. I don't know about you, but that ain't in my back yard. The point is neither trip resulted in "Post Card" images. I also went into Yellow Stone mid-Winter. The river was steaming against the cold air, with eagles flying through it. The mist from "Old Faithful" turned the nearby forest into a crystal fantasy. When working in NY I get up before dawn and shoot the city during the few minutes that it sleeps. Or just as it wakes up. Leave the color film at home and shoot Miami in Black and White ( that takes dicipline). Oh, and I love shooting around the house also. But given the choice of, say, LA during Oscar Weekend like I just experienced, and staying home to photograph Fluffy for the 10 millionth time, I'm on a plane pronto. Hmmm, I wonder how many airline points I have for use now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Thanks for the suggestions, <p> BW is not in the cards because I cannot self-process, read homeless. I used to when there was a down-the-street photo school/workshop club/rentable darkroom at 213-1/2 S. Main St. from our restaurant at 311 S. Main in Ann Arbor; probably already gone before you invaded my 'hood. I'd love to, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_williams Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Chris, Try one of the C41 B&Ws. While a bit harder to work with in a darkroom situation, they seem to scan very well and make excellent ink-jet prints or web files for posting. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 Marc, Thanks for the Idea, <p> I did try the B&W C41 process film, but the local lab (I don't remember the country) did not give satisfactory results; the prints appeared all soft focused when the color they were able to deal with better. I always hope that they get the film processind right. Then, someday, I'll be able to print them on my own. <p> It's quite a pity travelling so much; I'd love total control over the final product developing my own B&W and color. But, it's just I love what I do - getting paid to travel "into the world" w/all expenses paid and "living in the local economy", working with the local people, not judging, just asking questions and absorbing a different culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilhelmn Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Damn it, this is supposed to be a Leica forum. This is as bad as the "Critique my baby pictures" post, and those multiple posts of people with bipolar disease who stop taking their Lithium, and believe that every thought they have is of paramont interest to everyone who visits the forum. I used to enjoy sharing my limited knowledge and extensive ignorance with others of similar interests. I note that even Tony rarely posts any more, and I used to always enjoy his attitude and what he had to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_chen Posted March 31, 2002 Author Share Posted March 31, 2002 This forum is: "Leica Photography", of Leica AND photography - of objects living or otherwise photogenic to oneself - presumably of photographing these using Leicas, but as is obvious within this forum, the use and comments of Leica compatable equipment as well (Contax, Voit., Konica, Kiev, etc), is and has been acceptable. Paramount being photography. <p> And, this being a free forum, constructive answers are always welcome; as for the offensive or irrevalent, let's let the moderator determine that, as we are mere visitors. <p> In the end, if it offends you, ignore it and wait for the "gems" that WILL appear on sublects that are important to YOU that you didn't know before, or go someplace else. <p> Please continue to point out specific (not generalities) comments that are offensive/irrevalent to you such that I may rephrase my question/comment in the present and in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray_moth Posted March 31, 2002 Share Posted March 31, 2002 Chris, <p> Don't forget the southern hemisphere! From my limited experience, I would say that the most photogenic place I've ever seen is Sydney, Australia and its environs. One of Sydney's magical properties is the light. I emigrated there from England, a long time ago, in 1976 but I still remember vividly how I was overwhelmed by the difference from an amateur photographer's point of view. I think one could spend a lifetime photographing Sydney and still not run out of subjects and inspiration. I now live in Jakarta, which is not at all like that. However, one day I hope to return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoeica images Posted April 1, 2002 Share Posted April 1, 2002 My 2 cents on Leica travel photography: Best place in the world, IMHO- -Ireland. The westcoast is my favorite-Galway,Connemara, Westport, Roundstone, the Burren and the small southern town of Cobh. As long as you don't mind getting your Leicas wet(and they will get wet!), I recommend the Irish countryside, color or black n white. www.zoeicaimages.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralph_barker Posted April 1, 2002 Share Posted April 1, 2002 My suggestion, Chris, would be to relish where ever you can go, andshoot what speaks to you about that place. Every place and everyculture has something great to offer - if we pay attention. If yourjob takes you to these places, all the better. <p> My additions to your list would include Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand,and almost anywhere in Europe. All good targets for your Leica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now