david_scouffas Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 I've run into an interesting problem with my Nikon Super Coolscan 9000 scanner. I bought it new last summer. What I'm finding is that my scans (120 and 35 mm negatives, mainly color) show LOTS of dust and fibers. I had made the assumption that the issue was with the negatives and I've been trying to find a better lab to do my color negative processing, and working on ways to clean the negatives. The negatives seem really clean when I get them back from the lab, and I immediately put them in new clear plastic negative perservers. After going to one more new lab for developing my most recent set of negatives, and finding the usual problem with the scans, I took the scan files back to the lab and asked them to take a new look at everything. The lab guy looked the negatives and they looked clean. Viewing the scan files on his PC, he pointed out that the foreign material was sometimes in focus on the file, but often not in focus. His conclusion was that the problem might be dust and fibers inside the scanner itself. The scanner is located on my desk at my home office. I have never opened the unit for any reason. Because of the issues that I have had with dust, I have been careful to make sure that all the negative holders I use are always clean, and that I use white gloves when I handle the negaives. I DID send the unit into Nikon for repair last summer, so they probably opened it. Has anyone else had a problem with dust/fiber contamination with they're Coolscan scanners? Any ideas about how to clean the interior surfaces? I am reluctant to do much with the mechanism inside, including doing anything like blowing into the unit. Anyway, I thought I'd put these questions out to the forum and see if anyone has any ideas. David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Could you post some examples? If it's not in focus, I doubt it's in the film... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Dust anywhere in the mechanism will appear as an hazy streak the length of the scan. If it looks like particulate rather than a streak, the dust is on or near the negative. The DOF is quite shallow, so anything resting on the surface of the film or on a glass carrier may be indistinct. The LS-9000 will resolve particles of dust at the lower limit of detection by eye. Examine the negative with a strong cross light against a dark background. Anything you can see, the scanner will show as well. Digital ICE does a good job removing "small" problems like this. You will never eliminate these tiny particles outside of a clean room. You will get lint and chunks off with moderate care in handling and cleaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchell_kirschner Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 <p> <em>You will never eliminate these tiny particles outside of a clean room</em> </p> <p> Thank you, that concisely explains why in spite of storing and handling negs properly, and using a bulb blower, tiny stuff still finds its way into my scans. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_schneider Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 "I use are always clean, and that I use white gloves when I handle the negaives" - So do I - and I know from experience that clean white gloves, both cotton and synthetic, are full of dust. Their only plus is you avoid fingerprints on your negs. I've had better luck using latex gloves, though they do get hot. Good luck with the Nikon. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_scouffas Posted February 1, 2006 Author Share Posted February 1, 2006 Thanks to all of you who took the time to respond. The suggestion to use latex gloves was a good one. I'm going to take that advice immediately. Also, I will take the suggestion to use ICE to deal with the dust and put into practice. The bigger issue are the fibers...they can't be missed on the image. As for the progress, I've contacted Nikon and talked with their 3rd level support (a technical support manager) who asked me to send them some of the scans. While they look at the files, I'm just not using the scanner (brushing up on my C print skills ;-). On the chance that anyone else may run into a similar issue, I'll follow up with info on what Nikon did, or did not, do to help resolve this. David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now