xato Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I'm considering getting the Olympus 8mm fisheye when it comes out in a little while. Olympus' published MTF curves show high MTF in the center at 60 lp but it drops to around 10% at the edges. My question is whether or not I can use this 10% difference in values? Will the sensor be able to pick it up? If so, can I use PS to punch up the apparent sharpness? My thinking is that even with 12 bits of info per pixel, will this be sensitive enough to pick up a 10% analog difference in values. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 12 bits of digital can pick up differences of 0.025% in analog values. However digital and Photoshop are tools, not magic wands. If they were, you could correct the crappiest lens to produce razor sharp images. Bottom line - you can make it better, but you can't make it good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric friedemann Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Someone is welcome to correct me if I'm off the mark, but here is the chart WX refers to: http://www.olympus-esystem.com/dea/products/lens/8_35F/mtf.html As best I can tell, the Oly fisheye lens has excellent specifications for a fisheye. Though we are not told what aperture setting was used in testing, at what I take to be 20 line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm) (the blue line) the lens scored 93 in the center and 73 at the edge of the frame. Compare this to Photodo's testing at 20 lp/mm of the well-rated 35mm f/2.0 AFD Nikkor, which score 92 in the center and 85 at the edges af f/8.0- and that was a 35mm focal length lens you'd expect to have much better edge sharpness: http://www.photodo.com/prod/lens/detail/NiAF35_2D-442.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warren_kato Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Thanks but the Oly numbers are a little misleading in that if you compare at 20 lp/mm you also have to remember that the sensor is twice as small. So you would have to score 40 lp/mm to be the same. Yes, the digital Zuikos are tested at 20 lp/mm and 60 lp/mm. Canon tests at 10 and 30. PhotoDo tests at 10, 20 and 40. Popular Photo used to test at 30 lp/mm. Also the digital Zuikos are tested wide open and would probably be a little sharper stopped down one stop. <<As best I can tell, the Oly fisheye lens has excellent specifications for a fisheye. Though we are not told what aperture setting was used in testing, at what I take to be 20 line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm) (the blue line) the lens scored 93 in the center and 73 at the edge of the frame. Compare this to Photodo's testing at 20 lp/mm of the well-rated 35mm f/2.0 AFD Nikkor, which score 92 in the center and 85 at the edges af f/8.0- and that was a 35mm focal length lens you'd expect to have much better edge sharpness: >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now