nesrani Posted October 6, 2001 Author Share Posted October 6, 2001 OK, now I've stirred up the wasp's nest, here's my own feeling. <p> I first started snapping in the mid eighties because I saw a book of HCB portraits. I knew he used the Leica, so that's what I got. It promised a kind of spontaneity and simplicity, I don't know why. Mainly the transparency of the viewfinder and the small size. <p> Nowadays, I feel the same way, with the added impulse that I can't focus an SLR. <p> I still love the Leica M and can hardly imaging using another 35 mm camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r_watson9 Posted October 6, 2001 Share Posted October 6, 2001 After using a M for a wile, and get conscient of the frame and the time of exposure, perfect focus, the demand from the camera to be ON IT, and if with a little of talent it transform into good work, yes my dear rob is hard to pick up another system. <p> At the end it is a very demanding camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F. Posted October 10, 2001 Share Posted October 10, 2001 Hey Victor, I have a good wife, and she is a philosopher (expert on French philosophy, Merleau-Ponty, Feminism) and I shoot with a Leica. So what does that make me? <p> Rob, try this: <p> L ove of quality E ngineering I ngenuity C raftsmanship A ttention to detail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted October 10, 2001 Share Posted October 10, 2001 My two bits: <p> Luxury Expense Improbably Coveted by All. <p> Laughably Expensive and Inconvenient - Crazy Afcionados. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victor_randin Posted October 10, 2001 Share Posted October 10, 2001 Bob, sounds like you are just twice as exception :?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean_g1 Posted October 10, 2001 Share Posted October 10, 2001 Ok, I don't own a real Leica. Reading the posts here though reminds me of the Porsche 356 and 911s. They are widely acknowledged as fundamentally ill-designed cars. In fact in terms of conventional vehicle dynamics they are all wrong (too much weight way in the back). However, those who have adapted to them have turned those quirks into advantages. They do some things other cars just won't do (and maybe thankfully in the hands of the average driver). As a result Porsche drivers tend to have a distinct philosophy that involves their cars as distinct from others. As for my camera.. I have a FED-2 Russian copy of some imaginary Leica, perhaps with even more quirks. A camera such as mine forces one to be philosophical about everything ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_chefurka Posted October 10, 2001 Share Posted October 10, 2001 "Narrative rather than graphic, more about time than form". That is a brilliantly simple statement that I wholeheartedly endorse as the core of this slippery concept. It's precisely what I got out of my switch from Nikon to M. Thanks, Andy - that's going in my little box of photographic aphorisms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now