Jump to content

Techniques and approaches to Leica photgraphy


richard palmer

Recommended Posts

I know Lutz and others tried to promote this aspect of the forum, and I am also very keen to know how others approach photography. I to date have never gone out with the express desire to photograph.....This may come as a shock to some of you who I know do this so well. I personally keep my camera with me and when I have enough time snap away at well err mostly people I know cos they are, err near me. Well I really want to change this, I am drinking from the same glass all the time, and my photos illustrate this. I would be interested in how some of you approach street photography in this context. Do you just wander and see what happens, do you follow a theme, do you follow a person/group? What? On a more humerous side, I know a chap who took me for a Photography course when I first started who explained that he would pick an individual and 'stalk' him/her all day and produce a phot essay of a day of their life....with some interesting consequences. I guess this would not be too advisable these days...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find that the only way that I can get good photos is to work to a

series. In the past I too tried the 'take my camera everywhere and

hope for the best' and I usually came back with....nothing. A group

of us even started hangin out on Sundays - meeting early for

breakfast, getting all psyched and heading out to shoot -

and.....nothing. Now I set a goal, or series for myself. For the

last year I have been working on a series I call Cafe Culture. I hed

out to various cafes in the city and province I live and observe the

goings on and the people in them. Often I'll sit for an hour or more,

observing and getting a feel for what's going on before I'll shoot.

For me personally, without some sort of goal before I go out to shoot

I don't ge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully you realize that this question is in no way specific to any

brand of gear.<p>

 

This question, and many variants of it, have been asked many times.

The best way to find some answers is to read Bill Jay and David

Hurn's <i>On Being a Photographer.</i> Jan and Hurn make it clear

that photography isn't about using a camera, it's about

<i>passion</i> for the subjects and how they will look. If you don't

want to buy the book, do a search at photo.net on David Hurn and you

will find quite a bit of discussion on the topic.<p>

 

Speaking personally, I carry about five long-term (life-long)

projects in my head at all times, and look for subjects that fit

them, or create the subjects if I can't find them, and two or three

short-term projects. I still photograph quite a few things that

don't fit these projects, usually just to see what they look like on

film.<p>

 

I organize my work into broad categories that encompass these

projects, visible at <a href="http://www.spirer.com/">my web

site</a>. I don't separate photos by camera used - the topics are

completely independent of the camera, and most of the projects have

photographs made with several different cameras, mixing pinhole shots

with 35mm shots with 6x7. <p>

 

You should look inside yourself and see what you want to photograph

and what you want the photographs to look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, this is a good question to a common problem. And the

working to a theme answer is the only way I too can get going. If I

just go out with out direction, I wind up with nothing but a lot of

test shots, but little in the way of good and interesting. Start

with some research on a subject. Doesn't have to be brain surgery.

I am currently working on pictures of a dying trade, the timber

industry in SoWest Oz. I find old deserted mills, machinery and the

like and take photos in B&W, then develop and print them myself.

This will help get more into the hobby. PN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Bob. While I do try to have a camera with me all the

time. It rarely gets used because of that. The only exception would

be if I'm shooting photos of some random adventure that my friends

and I are having (which isn't really all that random of a thing,

since I've got a specific purpose, to document what happened that

day). I find that my best photos come from whatever projects I am

working on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My approach may seem a little different, but if you are interested in

street (art) photography and are having trouble discovering a theme,

then I would urge you to take a drawing class or two, at a community

college or an adult night school, or even if they're offered at a

local art museum. This will begin to discipline your eyes to see

composition. I bet that within a few short weeks your whole way

of "seeing" will change. My feeling is that one can not read about

art! You need to practice art to become good at it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's a Leica Moral Imperative to always have a camera with

you, but I found that I rarely got pictures that were good enough to

offset thew hassle when I did that, so I stopped.

 

<p>

 

I get my best results when I go somewhere with the specific intention

of taking pictures. If I have a theme or project in mind, so much

the better, but for me the point of the exercise must be the

photography. Having a camera along "just in case" results in

nothing, because I need to be more focussed than that.

 

<p>

 

Having a project or a theme or a passion or at least the desire to

explore a subject is essential, otherwise it becomes little more than

an exercise in craft (i.e. sharp, well-exposed, nicely composed

boring snaps). It's kind of like talking - you always say more

interesting things when you're talking about something you're

interested in.

 

<p>

 

I rarely do my best work when I'm with other people, because doing

good work requires me to immerse myself in the situation. Other

people would usually rather be doing something else, and my awareness

of this conflict keeps me from entering the "flow". The typical

result is a few hurried snapshots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard:

 

<p>

 

Since your subject header was "Techniques and approaches to Leica

photgraphy" - emphasis Leica - I'll answer this way...

 

<p>

 

The Leica is my travel and snap-shot camera. As such, it is used

mostly in a "street-shooting" manner. And "street-shooting" is not

something I am particularly facile with at this point in time -- it's

a skill I'm still learning. However, when I've done it successfully,

I have been a participant in the moment, interacting or connecting

with the subject in some way. Even something as simple as a smile

while I bring the camera to my eye to shoot sometimes makes enough of

a connection. When I'm a voyeur, lurking on the sidelines or sneaking

the shot, the photos don't seem to work at all; they look flat and

lifeless.

 

<p>

 

As I write the above, I realize that outside of Leica shooting I

still need to connect with my subject on some level. If it is in the

studio, I need to connect with the wishes of the client to capture

the essence of what they want, or the shoot will be unsuccessful. In

the field with my LF equipment, I need to connect with what surrounds

me, immerse myself in it, become part of it. When I perform that

critical step, connection, my images are successful -- when I don't,

aside from a few happy accidents of timing, they're generally nothing

more than a waste of film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the good advice here, I am a designer and have

my own realtionship with aesthetics and this is personal to me and I

am reasonably happy with this aspect. It is more the relationship

that you can afford with subjects that you do not know, striking the

balance between voyeurism and intrusion. Bob I too am very interested

in Cafe culture, so maybe there is my first theme Thanks. Out of

interest say you have been relaxing and absorbing for about an hour,

do you just take your camera out and shoot, do you stay where you are

or do you walk about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I took a photograpy course the instructor would give an

assignment to photograph a particular kind of subject, or at a

special time of day, etc. This gave the student a purpose and

direction for the work. Later I read an article by a photographer

who gave himself "self-assignments" when he was between clients.

This sounds just like what Bob Todrick means when he talks about

shooting a series. I find that I also will either work around some

theme or organizing idea for what I'm doing, or else the camera seems

to stay in the closet. Wandering about town with a camera, I don't

produce much, either. My next self-assignment is to photograph the

Fall colors. I've done that before, but this time I want to try some

shots using wider apertures to make a small area pop out against an

out of focus background. I don't know how that will work out with

this subject until I try. I think if I gave myself more self-

assignments, I would take more pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never leave home without my M3 or M6.Period.I bought the boxes to

take snaps and thats what they do so well.I have some 'series' but

also just shoot at things that catch my eye.Candid street scenes at

moment,plus the sad events,took pix of evacuation of city I'm in.

OK they sent all the workers home in the financial district.Attended

church ceremonies and took 2 pix.Went to Embassy and cried as people

sang "G-d Bless America" I took pix.I want to try and remember these

days of great hurt and also great humanity.So if one has a camera esp

a Leica that intrudes so little,use it.I was part of the happenings

and not a voyeur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...