terry_evans3 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hello, I have just purchased my first Hasselblad camera. It is a 501CF with an 80mm CFE lens. I get confused with all of the lens models when trying to choose the right portrait lens. The Hasselblad website says 150mm CFI. I am trying to buy a used lens and need to know the difference between all of the models and letters. What are the models of lenses can I choose from when searching for the right lens? Thank you very much for the suggestions. Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diegobuono Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 The classic portrait lens for Hasselblad sistem is the 150, then come the 180 and 120, the latter is optimized for close-up so, if you intend to use for landscape too this is not the better choiche. The letters after the focal lenght identify the kind of lens/mount. The first (and older) lens is the C, then came the C T* with a better anti-reflection coating, the again the CF with a different shutter and better handling, then the CFI with a better shutter spring (can be installed on the CF version too) and some cosmetic and andling difference. Some focal lengt came out in the CFE version, the E stand for Electronic and is useful only on the camera body of 200 series. The F version of the lenses (without the C) do not have shutter (theya re only for 200 serie) therefore are not compatible with the camera of 500 series because these camera need a lens with shutter. For some focal lengt there is a CB version that is similar to CFI but without the capability to sisengage the shutter (for 200 series). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_rhoades Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 The way it works is the more letters the more money.(Newer lens)A 150C of 150CF would be fine. A 180CF even better. Any of these lenses are too sharp for portraits. You will want some filters. The CF shutter parts are still available, not so the C model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_evans3 Posted December 16, 2005 Author Share Posted December 16, 2005 Thanks, that is a lot of help. What about the letter T? For exampe: CFT. Also, what does Sonnar mean in some of the models? Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_lee3 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 To me the best is 120mm S-Planar without T* coating. The Chrome version. I'd compared with and without T* coating using Fuji Velvia and Provia slides film and found the earlier chrome version without T* caoting far superior in terms of 3D and layering... Furthermore this focal length gives very natural perspective that is closest to naked eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 "T" in literature means the lens has "T*" coating - a multi-layer process for better freedom from flare and ghosting. Some older "C" lenses are not "T*", but do have a single-layer coating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Edward,<br><br>That's not quite correct.<br><i>Single</i> layer coated Zeiss lenses bear the red <b>T</b> mark.<br><i>Multilayer</i> coated lenses are marked with a red <b>T*</b>.<br>So <b>T</b> does not (!) stand for <b>T*</b>.<br>;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Terry,<br><br>"Sonnar" is the name Zeiss uses to indicate a family of lenses of a certain related design.<br>The name itself is derived from "Sonne", german for "sun". The typical "ar" ending is a bit of a mystery. It could be that it was derived from greek "archoo", be the first, or the related "aristo", the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Terry, After retiring my Rollei TLR I bought 501CM + 80CFE, like you. I just bought a 150 CF. I tried the 120 and didn't like it. I never looked at the 180 because of all the talk about it being "sharper" than the 150. I like the 150, but will soon be investing in Softar filters for portrait work. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Oh... one more thought. 150 CF's seem to be quite available on the internet auction site for $500 - 800 in fairly decent shape. 150 C's even cheaper. The 150 CFI seems to be > $1500 at the auction site and > $3000 new. This information helped me make up my mind of what to buy. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_martin2 Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hi Terry, I posted a similar question awhile back about the meaning of the various Zeiss lens names. Fortunately for us, Zeiss describes them all here: http://www.zeiss.de/C12567A8003B58B9/?Open Q.G. is right about the etomolgy of the Sonnar name. The lenses were designed to have few glass-to-air surfaces, and for speed and flare reduction. Have a good one, Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_kuzenski Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Terry, congratulations on your new Hassy! They're amazing and wonderful cameras. When I first got my own, someone on photo.net very kindly suggested that I also buy a copy of "The Hasselblad Manual," by Ernst Wildi. This was INVALUABLE advice; Mr. Wildi's book is packed with useful and helpful material, cover to cover. It will tell you everything you need to know about compatibility of lenses, backs, accessories, etc--at least, it's always answered any questions *I* had. If you are anything like me, you'll use it OFTEN as you learn your new camera, and it will be a useful reference for years to come. Good luck, and have fun! --Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_evans3 Posted December 16, 2005 Author Share Posted December 16, 2005 Everyone, Thank you very much. That is everything I need to know to have confidence in my purchase. Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 de Bakker, Are there any CF lenses NOT T* coated (other than the SuperAchromats or special-purpose lenses)? I believe the question was regarding the designation "CFT", the 150mm in particular;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tito sobrinho Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 There are no Hasselblad Zeiss' lenses with the CFT designation! Perhaps the confusion came from HFT for the Zeiss-Rollei. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
35mmdelux Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 The �best� portrait lens has more to do w/ your shooting style than that of others. There have been many great portraits shot w/ a regular standard lens; see the legendary August Sanders work. With this caveat, I would consider the 100mm, 120mm, 150mm, and the 180mm lenses as outstanding portrait lenses. One other consideration is whether you�ll be shooting portraits handheld or tripod bound. If handheld you may not want the 150mm nor the 180mm since at these focal lengths are harder to keep stable due to focal length/slow aperture combination. If you prefer to work more close-up as I do, then consider the razor sharp 100mm or the 120mm makro-planar. On cost, remember its relative. When I started shooting H�bld in 1990 the prices were far higher than today. Today, the web and digi have leveled the playing field. My other camera is a Leica and if you want to see expensive���by that contrast H�blds begin looking very reasonable cost wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 Edward,<br><br>Whether there are or are not CF lenses that are not T* coated has nothing to do with the fact that "T" does not stand for "T*" ( as in <i>"T" in literature means the lens has "T*" coating"</i>).<br>The little difference is important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flying_tiger Posted December 16, 2005 Share Posted December 16, 2005 I use both 120/4 CFi Makro and 150/4 CFi for portrait. The 150/4 is a classic portrait lens. Very sharp! The 120/4 is a beautiful lens for portrait and close-up. It's stunningly sharp and has little distortion. Brilliant color rendtion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_evans3 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 I just purchased a 150 cf t* in mint condition for $725.00. The fci lenses were about twice the cost, used. What difference will there be in the results from these two lenses? Also, I am having a very hard time finding a flash bracket for my 501cf with waiste lever viewfinder. I will be using a Vivitar 285 flash. The Hasselblad brackets are way overpriced. Thanks, Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 Terry,<br><br>You will see no difference between the CF and CFi versions.<br>Apart from mechanical and (other) ergonomical changes, the only difference between the two is that internal baffeling (stray light reduction) in the CFi is somewhat more elaborate than in the CF. You may be able to see that in extreme, back-lit shots. Or perhaps not even then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leorossi Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 Here is the link to the D.A. Munroe online Hasselblad Lens Guide. http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/hassylens.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonpg Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 Congratulations Terry. I think you mean you got a 501CM and an 80mm CFE lens, which kit I also started out with some 5 years ago. For portraits the 150mmm is quite commonly used although the 180mm is also commonly used. I acquired a 180mm specifically for portraits, well before I acquired a 150mm lens for more genaral shooting since it is one of the more "stellar" Hassy lenses boasting superb sharpness. The 180mm is so sharp that some use it with a Softar when shooting closer head / shoulder portraits of women - so sharp it can show every skin imperfection! For me and many others, the 180mm is a "preferred" portrait lens giving you more working distance from the subject and tighter head/shoulders shooting. This is one magnificent lens for whatever purpose (compresses landscapes beautifully) and is said to be more a "stellar" performer due to its far more recent design. The 150mm (as is the case for all Hassy lenses frankly IMHO) is also a beautiful lens. Many prefer it to the 180 since it is physically a bit shorter and lighter than the 180mm, making it a more convenient all-purpose lens. I use mine a lot especially hand-held when out and about where weight is an issue (take my 1.4xe as well giving me a very sharp 210mm lens as well). But, I never use it for portraits especially if I'm seeking head/shoulders images. At the other end of the 150mm, the 120mm is also a wonderful lens but getting a little too wide for portraits unless you're happy working closer to the subject or looking for more "whole body" images. It's quite a special lens due to its optimisation at distances shorter than infinity (and very sharp at infinity too). So you've really got 3 choices and I suggest you consider the "wider" applications you intend so that which one you go for "fits" your kit neatly in the longer term as it grows. If you go to Carl Zeiss' web site you'll see a page for Hassy lenses and focal length image comparisons you can trial on-line to get the comparison. The 150 has a similar AOV to a 90mm in 135 format and the 180 is more like circa 110mm in 135 format with the 120mm being similar AOV to about 70mm in 135 format. But remember these will have DOF as per their nimonal focal lengths rather than the 135 format equivalents. Hope this helps your deliberations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e_b7 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 The 80mm you already have is good for portraits so long as they are not head shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainer_nagel Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Hi, it has been said in another photo.net thread that the old S-planar 5.6/120 would have much better flare resistance than the later 4/120 flavor. However, scratch that and get a decent Kompendium with masks. also CFi lenses are marketed flare improved. I enclose an example picture using the useless 80-250 plastic hood. --rainer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now