stephanie_cheney Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 What scanner do you suggest to get high enough resolution scans to make albums such as wedding albums, baby books, etc? I will need to scan prints of the pictures. I am making albums as large as 9x12" so I need the images to be good resolution. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric friedemann Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 What film sizes are you scanning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_martin5 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 If you want high resolution you need to scan the film, not prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric friedemann Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 Sory, I kneed to reed bedder. What Robert said. You would be waaaaaaaaay better off scanning negatives than prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterblaise Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 . ANY modern flatbed scanner will have way more resolution than your printer. 400 dpi is all that's needed for 1:1 scan:print size, and all have sufficient bit depth. Buy what you want, try it, and return it if it angers you or fails to make you happy! The market is full of 11x8.5" flat bed scanners. I got a used HP 1,200 dpi 16-bit USB flatbed for $5. Click! Love and hugs, Peter Blaise peterblaise@yahoo.com http://www.peterblaisephotography.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephanie_cheney Posted December 19, 2005 Author Share Posted December 19, 2005 I will have to scan the prints from some of these because they are coming from customers who have their own pictures they want to use.. not from a professional photographer but their own candid shots of their baby, etc. Is there any other way of getting a high res image from someone's print other than scanning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric friedemann Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 In that case, for those times when I need to scan documents, old prints or make test pattern prints to balance my viewing monitor, I've got a Canon LiDE scanner I'm fond of. It scans well, has easy-to-use software, has a very small footprint (doesn't take up much computer table space) and has no power cord (it draws its power from its USB connection): http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=364945&is=REG&addedTroughType=search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_martin5 Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 You need to be careful that you don't violate copyright laws if you are scanning prints that may be from professional photographers. You are less likely to have this problem if you scan the negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 dont need a HIREZ scanner to do this, any scanner will do the job... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 Just about any flatbed scanner. And what's the photographer going to do, sue you? This is 2005: if the "photographer" has been counting on print sales (ie padding the billing for Walmart work) to make his living, he's already out of business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claytontullos Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 Well you wont be able to do any real enlargements, not beyond the original size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now