terence_patrick Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I've read in this forum several times that the 75mm shift lens is notwide enough for architecture or interiors, but I'm more interested inits use as a portrait lens; namely to capture full body images. Willthe shift provide selective/shallow DOF similar to a large formatcamera?<br /><br />Will it allow me to correct some perspective so ifI have the camera on a tripod around waist-high, the image will notlook like I'm shooting up a person's nose (if they're standing up)? <br /><br />If you have some images using the 75mm shift photographingpeople, I'd love to see them! BTW, I'm considering this lens as wellas the 65mm f/4 lens. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick_england Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I just came across your post Terence, and was interested to read that the 75mm shift isn't wide enough for interiors. Bugger. I was going to start bidding for one on e-bay. Isn't it the widest shift Mamiya do? If not, what on earth have RB users done before to get perspective control at wide angles? Not exactly the reply you were after I know, but if you have any info, I'd be grateful. Cheers, Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewlamb Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 A friend of mine has the 75mm shift and it's the only lens he uses for interiors. He raves about this lens. As for portraits, my guess is that it would be too wide. I would imagine that the perspective would not be particularly flattering and I can't see how using shift would improve matters. YMMV, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_meckley1 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Lens shift does not allow you to change the angle of the plane of focus - you need lens swing and lens tilt for that. If the camera is at waist level, the view will be from waist level; lens shift will not affect that, either. For what it's worth to you, I consider the 75 (and the 65) too short for classic full length body shots. I would consider the 110 a minimum for that application, with the 127 or even the 150 preferred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmf Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Perspective correction isn't magic. Think what happens whan you look up at a building. The vertical parallel lines will seem wide near you and will appear to narrow away from you. PC will bring those lines back to parallel. Thats why they're so important to arch. photography and also to product work. Think looking down on bottles where you you wan the top and bottom to be the same size. In general, short lenses and people don't go together. I have a RB67 and use 180mm for head an shoulder. Even thats too wide if I want to get closer. I just crop latter to fill the image if need be. I would consider the 127mm the shortest people lens. I should also add the a shift lens doesn't really address focusing issues like a view camera with tilts and swings can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heller_harris Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Some words in this string are linked to advertisements. Is this new PN policy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny_liao Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 You could shoot portraits with any lens. It all depends on your style. Look at Platon (http://www.platonphoto.com/) and his wide angle portraits with what I believe are shot with Hassy's 40mm. Or Julie Dennis Brothers (http://www.juliedennisbrothers.com/) work with Mamiya 75mm. She is also showcased in Mamiya's Masters section. If you go there, you could check out some of her work shot with the 75mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terence_patrick Posted August 4, 2005 Author Share Posted August 4, 2005 It was Julie Dennis Brother's work that interested me in using the 75mm shift lens in the first place. I know she uses, it but I'm not sure in what capacity she uses it in comparison to other lenses. I was initially interested in using a low-end Toyo 4x5 for a portrait project, but figured my RZ67 would just save me money in the long run. The 110mm is fine for headshots, but it's not wide enough for what I want to do. Having never used the 65mm, I wasn't sure if I'd run into distortion issues, so that led me to investigate the 75mm shift lens. Again, if anyone has links to others who've used this lens for portraits, I'd love to see them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drew_barr Posted January 21, 2006 Share Posted January 21, 2006 I've just moved to the RZ. In the past with the M645, i've used that shift for mostly exteriors where you are looking at a building. On interiors, use a wider lens to bring more of the scene into view and of course keep the camera perfectly level. On the 645, I use the 35mm lens for interiors. I think the 65mm would be great for the RZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now