oswegophoto Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Just got my first camera with a leaf shutter (Yashica Electro 35), and read that the shutter should never be left cocked for any period of non-use, which made me wonder. Does anyone know if the logic of preserving the springs, etc. applies to focal-plane shutters, also? Now, I know there's not much I can do about this with a camera that has a built-in drive (e.g., my N90s), but what about my FM2N and my F3? Certainly cocking leaves the shutter and its mechanism in a different state, but does it make any actual difference, functionally, which way it's left? I suspect not, since Nikon doesn't say so in the manuals I have, but thought I'd ask and see if there was anyone out there who knew. Not that I'll suspend activities until I know, mind you, but I want these 20 & 25-year-old cameras to make it to 50, if they'll still make film for 'em. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_levine Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Leaving any mechanical device under "tension", is usually not a good idea. Most 35mm SLR instruction books, do warn against storing cameras with their shutters cocked for long periods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_h1 Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I always leave the shutter's uncocked on any camera as habit. This way there is less tension. Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Hasselblad recommends leaving shutters and body cocked. This seems to defy logic and the popular opinion. Perhaps it is because that system needs to have body & shutter cocked to remove and replace parts. Perhaps it is because the stress on springs and shutter parts really isn't detrimental. Perhaps it is because Hasselblad thinks anyone that can afford a Hasselblad can afford to repair it when it breaks. I'm not exactly sure. I've read enough from metalurgists that indicate that prolonged static stress on well-made springs really isn't a problem. But we all know that springs occasionally break! Personally speaking, I don't worry too much about it... but when I store a camera or mechanical clock/watch for a prolonged period, I don't leave the mechanism under tension. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael erlich Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I have also always stored cameras with shutters fired or uncocked. But with my newer Nikon SLRs such as the F100 or DSLRs, leaving the shutter uncocked is impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswegophoto Posted April 12, 2006 Author Share Posted April 12, 2006 Thanks for the responses, guys. If my NAS gets so out of control that I have cameras I'm actually storing unused, I'll know what to do. I think I may just leave 'em uncocked between sessions anyhow. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_lofquist Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I have always left my cameras' shutters (both Leicas and Nikons) cocked. I want to be ready whenever I see a picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_oleson Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I usually have time to cock a camera that's in storage on a shelf before i have to use it; there's not that much cool stuff going on in my work room. So I leave them uncocked on the shelf, and I cock them immediately after each shot when I'm actually using them. :)= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zave_shapiro Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 There is little difference between cocked and uncocked. This isn't a watch being wound up fully and allowed to run down. This is a spring that has to do the same job the same way tens of thousands of times. Cocked it might be at 60% tension, uncocked at 45%. The spring is under tension its whole life, and has to operate in the most predictable and stable part of its range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oswegophoto Posted April 14, 2006 Author Share Posted April 14, 2006 Zave, thanks! That makes a lot of sense, and seems to lay the question to rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now