j.kivekas Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Does anyone know a portable flash system, perhaps a slave, that could support a5-8.5 fps shooting up to say 5 frames, or at least 3 frames. <p>This would befor sports shooting to fill-balance the subject and backgound. Say you areshooting a marathon and you've found a nice scenic place but a difficult lightsitu: runners in shadows or in pointy sunset light and background that isbathing in gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.kivekas Posted August 11, 2006 Author Share Posted August 11, 2006 OK, marathon wasn't probably the best example but, say, downhill biking, inline skating - something where you need continuous shooting for timing or for statistical reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kin_lau Posted August 12, 2006 Share Posted August 12, 2006 Get multiple flashes that you can set in manual mode, say 1/32 to 1/128 power, and use a remote trigger for them. The only reason why I say multiple flashes, is that their combined power would be required for fill-flash in the kind of light described. On my 20D + 580EX, at 1/32 power, I can shoot continously @ 5fps for at least 10 frames, at 1/16, it's good for about 3 to 4 frames. I also have 2300mah batteries in them. An external powerpack would likely give you a few more frames in 1/16 power as long as you don't melt the flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j._scott_schrader Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 In my experience 1/32 power would have absolutely no effect in an outdoor setting as the original poster describes. He is shooting action...so he cannot be in their face...he will have to be shooting from a distance... to balance the light of a strobe fired into a shaded area with the light of a sunlit (even if the light is low) area you are going to need a relatively high GN and a relatively long recycle time. Without using mutiple cameras with strobes for each one and an automatic trigger that basically lets the athlete take his own picture when he crosses an infrared beam, I suspect that what you are wanting to do can't be done with ordinary gear. The closer you can get to your subject, ...the better the chance of having your fill flash be effective at a lower power and the less recycle time it will need. If this is a set up...shoot late in the day or early in the day in an area where the light is the same on your subject as it is in the background....or the background a stop or two darker than your subject then you will not need strobes at all. There is not a strobe out there that is capable of the kind of power that you are talking about coupled with the almost instant recycle times that you will need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.kivekas Posted August 16, 2006 Author Share Posted August 16, 2006 Yes, I too believe that 1/32 or even 1/8 has very little function left in the situations I was referring to. I think there is room in the spots photography markets for a flash product that could do:<br> - up to 5 frames at 10 fps<br> - load up time less tan 15 secs<br> - nominal flash figure >40<br> - Capacity more than 100 flashes<p> I wonder could this be built from the old magnesium bulps ... a receiver and a microcontroller to multiplex the trigger signal to the next bulp.... are these bulps still available ... the circuit is not necesasrily very complex ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j._scott_schrader Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 Now I could be wrong ...and it wouldn't be the 1st time...but my guess is that the technology doesn't exist to create something like you are talking about. Over the last couple of decades they should have been pouring money into R&D of battery technology to make our country less oil dependent. Of course this did not happen and we are paying the price (gas prices) today. Of course the oil companies don't want any significant breakthroughs with battery technology...and it seems what the oil companies want, the oil companies get. Battery technology is way behind the times... and will continue to be as long as the oil companies have anything to say about the funding of such an endeavor that would ultimately cut into their profits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now