nasim_akhtar Posted May 19, 2002 Share Posted May 19, 2002 How nice is SIGMA 28-135 AFzoom for professional use. MY body is EOS300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NK Guy Posted May 19, 2002 Share Posted May 19, 2002 Er. Is this some sort of joke? The EOS 300 is rarely considered to be a 'professional' camera, let alone a dirt cheap (under $200 US) Sigma zoom lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louis_brown2 Posted May 19, 2002 Share Posted May 19, 2002 How good is my kodak disposible for pro use? same answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sajeev_chacko Posted May 20, 2002 Share Posted May 20, 2002 you have a great body...??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NK Guy Posted May 20, 2002 Share Posted May 20, 2002 This is a photography forum, not a pickup joint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klim Posted May 25, 2002 Share Posted May 25, 2002 SIGMA 28-135 is a great lens, but only for its price. The best choice, but only in budget zooms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louis_brown2 Posted May 25, 2002 Share Posted May 25, 2002 The words (great lens) and (best choice) should have some meaning, If you are refering to a canon 28-105, 24-85,28-135is, or even a nikon 28-105, 24-120, or minolta 24-105. then maybe those words would have some meaning in refering to the budget zoom class. But to use those words for a cheaply constructed 13 element Sigma is a joke.-LB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now