monsoonphoto.net Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 "DAVID BURNETT spent the dog days of 1963 prowling the drag strips ofSalt Lake City with his Yashica-Mat while he waited for his senioryear at Olympus High School. He has been taking pictures for moneyever since..."<P>Full text here:<Ahref="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/technology/circuits/08schiesel.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/technology/circuits/08schiesel.html</a><P>Be sure to check out the multimedia presentation as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thanz Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 very interesting, thanks Alan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricks Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 kudos alan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Interesting multimedia --- almost entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owen w. Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Alan, You beat me to it. The companion article on the photo printing industry is also interesting. (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/technology/circuits/08selingo.html) <p> In the Burnett article, what is interesting to me is what was NOT discussed in the several threads on Alex Majoli's work: the significant differences (possible) in the images. Alex waxes about the depth of field the small digitials provide him, delivering what Burnett calls the "where's Waldo" depth of detail to every image. The "need" of news imagery has shifted, along with the loss of awareness of differences in the imagery making. <p> Great article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georg_langs Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 This february on digitaljournalist.org there was an article by David Burnett about how it felt following the campaign with the SG: http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0402/dis_burnett.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
35mmdelux Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 evocative. best, from LA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCULUS New York Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 The irony is that if you view those gorgeous Graphlex shots at "full screen" they became very pixelated. Shame on the NY City Times for low-res slide show. Ray Hull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jan_brittenson Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Wow, 50 cameras and lenses! He much be a rich collector! He'd be laughed out of this place for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now