bill_thorlin Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 An irrelevant comment from a member of an irrelevant country. The lovable face of the USA has spoken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_spiers Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Trevor, your explanation is absolutely on the button. It's absurd to think that the NYT is making any point in the film/digital debate just because they used a pic of a TLR. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_reynolds Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 I think Trevor was right too, but he should have used <a href="http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/sign162.htm">this</a> example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunom Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 I didn't realise that the UK had its own set of road signs, I thought they were fairly universal? Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socke Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 <irony> I think it's a con to get the US legislators to ban all photographic inventions after 1950. Terrorists won't use ISO25 single layer black and white emulsions in a meterless LTM type camera, would they? </irony> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne_murphy8 Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 I doubt that I have ever read a more pointless thread. Don't you all have better things to do? Get a life. Bah, humbug. Oh sorry, have a nice day anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_boyle3 Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Trevor, do they still use steam engines in England? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socke Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Oskar, given suficient thrust pigs fly just fine, but you never know where they land and you don't want to be under them :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socke Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 John, don't know about England but a friend of mine makes a living building steam engines in germany.<br> <br> <a href="http://www.dampfmaschine.com/index_e.html">Tea Light Steam Engine</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_lazzarini Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Helen Bach,<p><i>And here is the UK traffic sign for an "Area in which cameras are used to enforce traffic regulations".</i><p>Drat!<br>When I was in Scotland recently, I thought these were indicators for tourists as to where photo opportunities existed! :-P<p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_reynolds Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 John: This is a country in which road atlases still show Roman place-names. Only recently (1972) did we drop the abbreviation d. (=denarius) for penny. So OF COURSE we still use steam engines! See <a href="http://www.swanagerailway.co.uk/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.steam-fair.co.uk/">here</a>, for instance. These are just two in my region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_mcallister Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 >If I got sent on an assignment to take a picture of a photo student, and three showed up, two of them wearing Nikon/Canon/Leica(!) digital SLRs and one with a nifty looking TLR around her neck, guess who I'd use the most pixels on.< The hottest lookin one I'd hope, but then this here's the Leica forum an you all get off on cameras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Claudia: I'm sure some would say that in a sinsiter way the editorial decision of the New York Times to run a picture of a tired, out-dated, non-mainstream and elitist form of making pictures reflects its liberal bias. ;>) Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_thorlin Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Steam engines - of course we use steam engines, how else do we get the power to run the abacus and the (steam) radio ? (It is rumoured that in the outlying regions some still use a donkey and a treadmill) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_reynolds Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 This is the Leica forum, so we are all technologically conservative, right? A donkey and treadmill is Appropriate Technology if it works and the donkey is content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Bill: Every summer purists, like myself, travel to eastern Kentucky for a few weeks of vacation and strip mining where we stock up on our coal supply for the entire year. ;>) Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fivetonsflax Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 ^<br> |o|<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_thorlin Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Coal ! It is still wood-burning technology for me - at least I can use the ash for the fruit trees so there is some re-cycling. Come to think of it the donkey might be good in this respect so may go retro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammer Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 There's a cloud outside my window that looks like an EOS 20D... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 John you asked if they still use steam engines? Yes they do in a few places. This one I was on a few days ago is a scheduled service (once every 40mins all day and all evening, all year) for local commuters and shoppers as well as tourists....<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan flanders Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 I have read the NYT regularly for the past thirty or so years and am fully convinced that anything they print has an angle to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Makes sense to me. Better to make a picture <i>of</i> a TLR than try to take a picture <i>with</i> one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtdnyc Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Given that the New York Daily News uses a picture of an old-time press camera as its logo, the Times's use of a TLR is downright avant garde. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCULUS New York Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 I suspect that they had no idea what they were representing. For a couple of years, I had on my office wall a digital photo of an Amtrak train that appeared across about 5 columns on the front page of the Metro section. It was the worst published photo I have ever seen: Literally, it looked like needlepoint. Then they went to that blurred action-style digi print for while, and they retired that. So, to expect that they would feature a Leica is folly. In sum, in my estimation, they haven't a clue, but they sure do have a bias. Cheers,Ray Hull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 That photograph looks like it could have been taken anytime in the last 100 years...Proof, if proof is needed, that there will always be an England.:-) Hurrah for England! (writing in NYC) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now