guy_mancuso Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Travis that maybe me and you but for the beginer it maybe to check composition, focus , exposure and such. So instant can be helpfull for them . For me it would be lighting and histo and maybe focus. So different things depending on ones experience but for a beginer i think it is helpful does it make you a better photographer.No only your desire to be one will this is just a tool that has some benifits to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zapata_espinoza Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Come on, I is the editing not the shooting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jd_rose Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Mr. Kaplan, Excellent. What a great way to learn photography! Galen also said the same thing about chrome. "I press the button and then I am done." Chrome forces you to do it well and to do it right the first time. I learned to photograph with K64. Your mistakes live forever on that stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pierre_claquin1 Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 I have been using digital cameras for 3 years now and occasional films. I see several advantages to digital shooting: costs and conservation of film; possibility and ease to change the ASA between pictures but more important the possibility to immediately check that I have the picture(s) I wanted. I am interested mainly in people and in wildlife. You can see examples at www.ventsdest.netI am looking forward to the availability of the Digital M But am I now a better photographer? Possibly but in any case more quickly aware of my mistakes and flaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Digital is a good learning tool for things like learning flash techniques. More photos with digital? Sure. Better? Nope. Checking that you got the shot is stupid, unless it's something you can shoot over right away like a wedding formal or a still life or a commercial shot. For everything else the moment isn't repeatable. And while you are checking the last shot, the next one happened while you weren't looking. See it all the time with people who shoot photojournalist weddings. Cheaper? Nope. The only difference in price is the cost of film stock and the film processing. Proofs and prints are the same price ... but the digital gear is a lot more expensive to buy and maintain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now