olivier_reichenbach Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 Vic, I think the cell-phones-sex survey has some merit, if only to show that we live in a society going more depressing by the day, where 100% of the respondents actually leave their cell phones on while having sex, even if not all them intend to answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishik_tuna Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 "This study was made by analizing the postings on two N/NW threads" analizing....yikes i bet that hurt!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 17, 2005 Share Posted May 17, 2005 The stupids are out in force today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbizarro Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Duh! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Going out to the Oman mountains tomorrow for taking pictures. I'll take both EOS 1V and Pro1. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 statistical analysis ??? - based on a tiny non-representative sample. Troll on. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kastner Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Do not forget what the great Disraeli once said (I think around 1900 or so)... <br> "The three worst liars in the whole world are... <br>(a) liars, <br>(b) infamous liars, and <br>© statisticians." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allan brewer Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 I'm not a statistician, but I do know enough statistics to say the following: There's nothing wrong with the sample size. Seventy-nine trials is adequate for a study like this. Applying Pearson's Chi Square test of independence, under the null hypothesis, chi square follows a chi square distribution with degrees of freedom=1. At the 95% level of confidence (the usually accepted amount), and since chi square is greater than 3.841 (it is 43.8), the data show that photography format (digital vs film) is dependent on the photographer's country of origin (Germany or USA). There is no data submitted to support the conclusion that American and tiny-island fishmerman photographers are related in this regard. If you have any argument it is with the "extrapolation" methodology. As someone already pointed out, anything on these web sites has been digitalized and likely color has been manipulated (either saturation or desaturation). Thanks. Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliot_rosen1 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 A statistical analysis of a sample of 2 W/NW Threads on the photo-net Leica Two threads on photonet Leica are a valid sample to conclude differences in patterns of use in the USA vs Germany. Eugene, you should have stopped at "I'm not a statistician". That's the most accurate statement in your post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allan brewer Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Elliot, I didn't invent categorical analysis: Pearson did. Like it or not, the numbers are what they are. Thanks. Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now