j_smith6 Posted December 24, 2004 Share Posted December 24, 2004 My Canon lens 75 - 300 mm (not usm) is a bit too noisy. Is it normal? The engine of the AF makes awful sound(aaaagggggggggrrrrrrrrhhhhh). If anybody who has the same lens has the same problem? Merry Christmas, Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_murray Posted December 24, 2004 Share Posted December 24, 2004 We have two of these one USM one not USM. The USM is quieter than the other one and definitely focuses faster. Yours may have a problem if it is that loud. Go to a photo store and try one there to see how it sounds. Maybe you never used the old AFD Canon EOS lenses. Those were loud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_smith6 Posted December 24, 2004 Author Share Posted December 24, 2004 Thanks for answering I just didn't think about going to the shop and trying another lens. (Why didn't I think about it earlier... Maybe becaus of Chistmas:) One more question can I make from normal lens USM? If yes how much doest it cost? Merry Christmas and a happy NEW YEAR - Michael. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_dunn2 Posted December 24, 2004 Share Posted December 24, 2004 <p>You can't modify the non-USM lens to make it USM. You'd have to take it back to the store and see if they would let you exchange it (and pay a bit more, since the USM model costs a bit more).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_murray Posted December 24, 2004 Share Posted December 24, 2004 No they cant be modified. The glass is the same in both lenses only the motor is different. There is a big difference in focus speed. If you can get the USM model. Or the 100-300 USM model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pablo_s Posted December 24, 2004 Share Posted December 24, 2004 I haven't tried the USM version of the 75-300, but I've read many times that it's micro USM, not "real" USM and so the difference is barely noticeable. The 100-300 has "true" USM, but it's more expensive as a result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_smith6 Posted December 25, 2004 Author Share Posted December 25, 2004 If I can't change it for USM I'll just see can it be more quiet. Greetings, Michael. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron c sunshine coast,qld,a Posted December 25, 2004 Share Posted December 25, 2004 I've owned/used several of these over the years including the first non usm model ,later usm versions and non usm's plus the 100-300 USM lens <BR>All the 75-300 lenses are rather quiet.The usm versions are kind of like a soft hissing noise,not like a motor sound at all and very easy to not hear . <BR>The non usm versions are still very quiet but sound slightly motor-like.They certainly couldn't be considered noisy by any means! <br>I'd say you definitely have a problem with yours <P>Canon did make noisey lenses but that was back in the days of AFD motors-they sound abit like a dentist drill! ! :) <P>By the way-i must dissagree that the usm versions of the 75-300 lenses are much faster at focussing.I'd guess they focus about 30-40%(?)faster...but the point is that ALL versions of this lens focus too slow for fast action <BR>Don't get me wrong,these lenses are quite good for a cheapie-i currently have the IS version.But if you need fast focus for sports,etc,buy the excellent 100-300/4.5-5.6 USM.It's <a href="http://members.dodo.net.au/~l8r_ron/index_2.html">abit sharper</a> ,better built and has the genuine ring type usm motor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_smith6 Posted December 25, 2004 Author Share Posted December 25, 2004 In new year I'll go to canon service and ask about it. I'll try to send on your e-mail the sound of engine. Thank you for writing and giving so good answer. Happy new year, Michael. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socke Posted December 26, 2004 Share Posted December 26, 2004 I've just tried my 75-300 and I can hear it with a TV at normal listening loudnes in the background, but it is not loud.A bit more than the 35/2 and on par with a Sigma 28-70 EX. And a lot louder than the 24-85! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_smith6 Posted March 25, 2005 Author Share Posted March 25, 2005 It was broken, but in canon service I could took it back after one day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now