Jump to content

HCB & 50mm Lens


andy_sprauer

Recommended Posts

When HCB visited America, he supposedly decided that the 35 was the right focal length for the visual feel of the U.S.A. and used that mostly while here. Ultimately he decided he didn't like America very much and didn't like the 35 much either.

 

The rest of his stuff is almost exclusively 50mm. Most photographers using a 50 cannot create the sense of space and perspective he achieved with that lens. But just because you can't do it doesn't mean he didn't -- his compositional skills were uncanny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a portrait taken in the early 1930s by Hoyningen-Huene, HCB has a 35/3.5

Elmar on his Leica and a worn-looking 73/1.9 Hektor on the chair next to him. And in

a shot of HCB taken in NYC by Clemens Kalischer in the late 40s, he's got a Contax-

mount Zeiss Biogon 35/2.8 on his Leica, using one of those now-scarce adapters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He mostly used a 50, but there are pictures showing him at work with a 35,

90 and even a 135.

 

Odds are that he started out with a 3.5/50 Elmar and moved on to a Zeiss Sonnar 1.5/50,

which he dumped for a collapsible Summicron that he shot with to the end. He also used

the rigid Summicron and what looks like a version 3 or 4 Cron with the clip on hood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When asked about the 9cm lens, HCB responded, "Oh yeh. It removes the foreground." While he most likely had a 9cm he didn't use it very often.

 

In over 40 years of taking pictures I'm sure HCB used the 35mm as well. But the fact is 90% or better of his published work was made with a 50mm lens.

 

But why does it matter? Just enjoy his photographs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...