anders_sjogren1 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 What is the function of Epson RD-1's "film advance lever"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_evans4 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Cocking the shutter, I'm told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_a Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 cock the shutter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsoonphoto.net Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Apparently so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furcafe Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Yes, even digital cameras have shutters. The Epson has a mechanical 1, just like the Bessa R2 it's based on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_baird Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 That's interesting - I would have assumed that a digital rangefinder would use an electronic shutter. Are there advantages to mechanical shutters I'm unaware of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_larese1 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Doesn't take juice from the battery, feels like a camera the way God intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huw_finney Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 When you 'clear' the sensor all elements go down to 'zero' at once, but the data is shifted out it all goes past or even through the other pixels giving it a chance to pick up some highlights. Cheaper cameras have vastly fewer pixels and hence the problem is much less visible, they don't have shutters. The effect is easily seen on any news broadcast at night with lights in frame, you get a vertical streak of light in the picture. The 'electronic' shutter is still present in shuttered digital cameras though, enabling some blistering top speeds. The sequence is something like .. open mechanial shutter, clear sensor, charge sensor, stop charging, shut mechanical shutter, shift out image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregory_goh Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 It's for cocking the shutter - at least that is what this non-Japanese fluent person can figure out from the Japanese manual - it's late and the battery is in the charger so will have to play with it tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el_fang Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 A digital camera that has a wind lever for cocking the shutter. Sorta like a computer with a hand crank for powering up Windows. Priceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_unsworth1 Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Not stupid at all - a shutter will help prevent dust reaching the sensor. Having it as a crank means that the camera can be smaller and as someone else said saves on battery drain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david cunningham Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 my understanding is that it both cocks the shutter and advances the image when previewing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godfrey Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 It's a shutter cocking lever. Yes, digital cameras have shutters. Even cameras with electronic shutters use spring tension to power the action of the shutter in most cases. In all current DSLRs, the shutter is cocked by a servo motor. Epson/Cosina has simply decided not to incorporate a motorized shutter cocking mechanism into the RD-1. This also means that it cannot support making sequence bursts, of course. Godfrey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_tai Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 I've bought a RD-1 yesterday & I've a problem of focusing when it's wide open at my noctilux 50mm f 1.0 & 75mm f 1.4 .All the picture is not in focusing & they's sharp at the foreground. they've been in focus after stopped down to f/5.6 any leica M fans has any idea? Thanks for your valuable experience San<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huw_finney Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 I am suprised you got the focussing that good given the short baseline of the R, the biggest 50mm CV does is the f1.5 Nokton, about twice as easy to focus as an f1! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorge Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 >> Sorta like a computer with a hand crank for powering up Windows. Priceless. << If you loaded your camera with a windows based film, you would have to unload and re-load it after each thre or four frames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaijin Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 Eric, You also have to deal with the 1.5 (or is it 1.6?) crop factor when using your 50 f/1 or 75 f1/4 on the Epson. Essentially your 50 f/1 is a 75 f/1 on the Epson and the 75 f/1.4 becomes a 112.5 f/1.4 equivalent. So you're trying to focus a 75 equivalent lens at f/1 with the already too short rangefinder base of the Epson/Bessa body. I'll be surprised if you can get accurate close focus even with the CV 50 f/1.5 Nokton since it becomes a 75 f/1.5 equivalent on the Epson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edlaurpic Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Regarding focusing the R-D1 (with apologies for the repetition of this point from another forum), I thought that when there is a magnification factor in a digital camera so that a 50 becomes a 75, the depth of field remains unchanged ... it's still a 50 as far as dof is concerned, That is why little P&S digital cameras have dof from here to eternity and it's so difficult to get bokeh effects with, for example, the Digilux 1 and digilux 2 as their real focal length is like that of a superwide angle lens. So ... if the idea that it would be more difficult to focus a 50 on the d-g1 than on an M6 relates to the magnification factor, that would seem not to be true. On the other hand, if there is a focusing difficulty related to a limitation of the bessa-type rangefinder, that would be a different matter, and it's something I know nothing about. and about which I haven't read anything. If there is anything out there about that, I would appreciate a url. Thanks Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_tai Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Hello , I've finally test my leica lens ,tri-elmar & noctilux focusing are accuracy fine when wide-opened at f 4.0 & f 1.0 .But it's a pity of out focus using 75 summilux f 1.4 & 90mm summicron .The 75 work acceptable sharp at infinity,but out focus at my attached road photo. Please give me any appreciate experience. Does the Rd-1 cannot using the lens above 75 & 90mm? Thanks sang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct__ Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Hi Eric. <br>Would you mind to show us some of your sharp 50mm images? <br>Thanks in advance. <br>LCT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_tai Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 it's sharp & wide open when focusing at infinity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_tai Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 it's out of focus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_tai Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Epson RD-1 using noctilux sharp at 1.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct__ Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Eric, <br>The effective base length of the RD-1's rangefinder is only 38 mm in round figures. <br>To get sharp images at f/1.4 with a 75mm lens, you should need an RF base length of about 48mm according to the formula b' = (e x f^2) / (k x z) where b' is the effective base length, e the visual acuity (0.0003 here at approx. 1 arcmin), f the focal length, k the aperture and z the circle of confusion (0.025 mm). <br>Best, <br>LCT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct__ Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 Eric, <br>Here's a 100% cropping of your Noctilux pic at f/1.0. <br>The sharpness as well as the colour rendition and the noise reduction look very good indeed. <br>It is encouraging, as far as focusing accuracy is concerned, if you focused precisely on the sharp parts of the image needless to say. <br>Best, <br>LCT <br><br><center> <img border=0 src="http://tinyurl.com/rv7w/RD1cropweb.jpg"> </center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now