barclayphoto Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 I have a chance to purchase a very clean 501CM with 80mm lens two A12 backs and a Hassy 45 prism. $1,500. I'm a serious 35mm shooter, mostly nature with my Canon 1v's and "L" glass. My plan is to start doing more portrait stuff for some extra cash. Is this the right thing to do or should I embrace the digital reveloution with a 20D? I love film and am not considering the switch to digital for my nature stuff... I've always wanted a Hassy but I don't want to end up with one if it does not make sense... Interested in your thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julius_huang Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 No, you are not crazy. If camera/lens (shutter) is in good condition. Getting an extra camera/lens always make sense to me, if you have the budget and do take picture with it. But what do you mean portrait stuff? With your current equipment, you can photo just about everything you want without any new camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre_noble4 Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Especially if you do your own darkroom work or have faith in the future improvement of film scanners, the film route with the Hasselblad is one very good option. I have chosen the Bronica path myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maktime Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Get the hassy :D I bought a hasselblad 503CW about 1 year now and have never turned back beautiful camera and it takes fantastic photos with the carl zeiss lenses! Berry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_philcox1 Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Only god knows. Maybe film cameras are going the way of the turntable. Maybe not. If you have a pro lab in your city that is financially stable, a place you are comfortable taking your stuff to OR if you process your own Black and White in your own darkroom then get the Blad. I don't think anyone has to be embarrassed about their dislike or distaste for digital. I have a philosophical distase for digital - its cheap plastic throw away mentality - its snap happy drug-like appeal for the masses, its nerdy technicality as opposed to the tactile feel of shooting with a good rangefinder or a really solid SLR or the artisitic appeal of an old solid like a rock square mechanical TLR. Hey, I like CDs and DVDs are much better than VCRs but digicams - yuk - more plastic crap made in China destined for the landfill in the blink of an eye. Yeah yeah I know theres the 20D and the Canon 1d or whatever - they are solid, nice clean pixels etc. but they are also just really expensive plastic battery eating computer boxes with memory cards - how dull...and they retain their value like a 1972 Ford Pinto. And since I'm on a rant the photo.net posted photos are all now 10D or Digi Rebel shots, so technically perfect and photoshop adulterated, cropped and colorized to exquisite perfection - you'd think we all lived in Disneyland for christ sake. There was far more art, far more interesting work when this site was full of Leica M's, Blads, Mamiya 330's and Pentax 67's. There I feel better now. And think of what this digital revolution is doing to the pro photo shops. These people who have a real love of photography are being supplanted by pimple faced clerks or "associates" in the Walmarts and mega drug stores that polllute the landscape. Is this really what we photographers want??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne_crider4 Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Only you can say, but if you can't start doing more portrait stuff with what you have now, another camera isn't the answer. Overall, I find of my friends that shoot portraits, most rarely go beyond 11x14. In fact, 8x10 shots, especially headshots, seem the normal routine. One of my best friends is shooting a D100 and loves it, and most all he does is portraits with the occasional wedding. His theory is, his cost is cheap and turnaround fast and that's what most people want unless your the consumate salesperson and can upsell. I myself shot 35mm film for most my sitters and there was never a problem selling them because of lack of quality. Recently I purchased a 501cm and lens, with the attitude of using it for landscapes and some portraits but will probably use if more for the landscapes. I always wanted one tho and luckily had the means to buy it. Again, what your going to have to consider if your really interested in pursuing the portrait business is that a majority of people want it now and want it cheap. There's a kid with a camera on every street corner willing to practice for nothing and most everyone knows one if not a family member with a digital (instant feedback) camera. Personally I would not buy the outfit just to persue portraits. It would have to go beyond that, and maybe as I did, buy it because I wanted it. But therein lies another problem in that alot of us always just want another camera and we use an idea as an excuse. Personally my feeling is, is that if you always wanted a Hassy buy it. The time is right cause most all the pro's and advanced amatuers are running to digital. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barclayphoto Posted November 22, 2004 Author Share Posted November 22, 2004 Frank you make me laugh and feel validated all at the same time! I see digital as a marketing play for the greedy companies that make the stuff. Sure it is terrific for the point and shoot crowd who what snapshots but for us who love the craft of making images... not sure. I have a Sports Illustraed friend who swears by his 1d Mark II and has sold all of his film gear! He says digital rules in his world... Me I just love chromes on a light table! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
click agent Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 John, whatever you do DON'T buy the Hassey 501CM with 80mm lens, 2 A12 backs, and a 45 prism meter, very clean, for $1500.00. Please DO give me the contact information of the seller so that I can buy it. Umm... of course you should buy it. That is a great price for a great system. Cheers, Michael McCarthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_elek Posted November 22, 2004 Share Posted November 22, 2004 Frank, nice rant. A salesman at RadioShack recently told me that he's seen a resurgence in purchases of turntables. Not sure why the turntable is back. He said a lot of the hip-hop artists use them for sampling. I guess you can't do that with a CD player. Now, in reply to John. The phrase often used is that the current state of digital is "good enough" to replace 35mm film and pretty close to medium format. And digital gives you that instant feedback, low operating cost, etc. A Hasselblad and a digital/35mm SLR are very different shooting experiences. I don't find them comparable. With digital/modern 35mm SLRs, you pretty much frame your shot, push one button and the camera takes over (sort of the original Kodak concept: "You push the button, and we do the rest."). No need to focus, think about exposure, advance film or anything. And with digital, you can take two, three, 10 shots of the same subject. If the exposure isn't right, just reshoot it. With a Hasselblad, you get a finite number of shots per roll. And you have to focus, determine and set exposure, load and advance the film, etc. If you blow a shot, you don't find out until later. However, looking at the 6x6 chromes on a lightbox is a very satisfying experience that a computer monitor can't replicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne_brown3 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 I've been using an old rolleicord for a while and watching for good deals on MF. Sounds like a great deal... BTW, have you been to an "audiophile" type stereo shop lately ? Lots of turntables, and TUBE amplifiers are everywhere... there's always tomorrow, or, was that yesterday ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikos peri Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 No! <p> <small>Give it to me. ;)</small> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby_bruch Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Remembor film can also go Digital.But Digital can nevor go film.Film gives you the best of both worlds it can be a traditional photo it can be scanned put to CD but best of all you have alway's got a negative to fall back on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunom Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Bobby I do believe that you can have a digital file turned into film [neg/slide], but of course it won't be exactly the same as a film original. Regards Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_jones1 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Frank-I LOVED your rant, it expresses my thoughts exactly. I blocked and copied it and am making a large poster with your words on it. And yes, I am buying my bride a point and shoot digital because she has not fallen in love with my Blad equipment (what, no meter?) nor my "highly automated" collection of Nikon F2 stuff. Do your own thing, for crying out loud. If there is one thing I have learned in life, base your decisions on your own gut feel and don't let yourself be influenced by the masses or the "wisdom of the day." Buy the darn Hassy and see what it does in the film world for you. Hey, you can always put out the ten grand for the new digital back if you want to go that route. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uhooru Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 If I could piggy back on the original question. I have a choice of getting a Hassy 501CM, with an A12 back and the Zeiss 80mm. Its been well used and well cared for everything works perfectly. For a 1000 bucks..or for 1500, I can get a newer and more pristine 503 cw with the bright screen, Zeiss 80mm a12 back etc. If I get either, he'll throw in a Linholf shade. The seller is one of my photo teachers,and I've known him a couple years now, and a trustworthy guy etc. Question, I was told it might be best to plunk down the extra 500, because of one more sellable if I have to sell it for some reason, and secondly if I want to use a winder or remote or ttl flash etc. its built into the camera. This is making me lean towards the 503, though I don't neccessarily need those features, but the resale seems to make to some sense. I will be getting one of them. Thanx for your input Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Good deal to me, but I would want a longer glass for portraits like 150-180. An 80 covers the same angle as your 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_elek Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Barry, I'd probably buy the less expensive system and then use the extra $500 to buy a couple of bricks of film or put it toward a second lens. I agree that a portrait lens or wide angle is nice to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barclayphoto Posted November 23, 2004 Author Share Posted November 23, 2004 Terrific feedback folks! Thank you. No doubt I'm in love with Chromes on a light table. I do have an excellent Medium Format scanner already for my XPAN stuff.. so I'm making the purchase! Thanks to all you guys for spending MY money wisely! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonpg Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 John, Like all have said - no you are not crazy, quite the opposite. Like you I am an EOS 1vHS and L series lenses user. I added a 501cm and 50mm, 80mm, 180mm and 250mm lenses progressively. Using the Hasselblad is one of the great joys of my life now. The images are sensational. I have no overlap between my MF and 35mm systems because the both excell in different applications. The 501cm system gives me landscapes and portraits to die for!! I should add that this has made me learn more and more with every use and has even taken me into 4x5, again for quite different applications. By the way, the Carl Zeiss glass is made in Heaven! If you're impressed by L series lenses, the Zeiss lenses will blow you away. There is nothing much better than looking down into the 501cm view finder and through a Zeiss lens. The question between a 20D and a 501cm can only be answered by you as their applications are very different. Finally, now is a good time to get great gear at reasonable prices. Enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald_macklin Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Frank Philcox,that is one finely crafted and well thought out rant.I salute you.In fact it is much more than just a rant.It is a philosophically defensible perception.The end to all film vs digital arguments.Use what is appropriate for the task,but,question the motivation for the purpose of the image.Digital image machines encourage promiscuous image taking.Why is that to be encouraged(Other than selling more products.-inks,papers, discs,computers,frustrations,etc.)?And John Barclay,congratulations on your purchase of a fine rig,enjoy.Leica hack don. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayorson_kirk Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 you certainly make the right decision. As long as you use the camera correctly, your life will be embraced by the hassy 501 kit. Moreover, you can use adapter to link your 80mm2.8 planar with Canon 300D for portrait work and that will certainly make you happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audun_sjoeseth1 Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 Mayorson Kirk: This is a great idea. I plan to get an adapter to use my wonderful CFi100mm/3.5 on my EOS 1N and an EOS DSLR later. A 80/2.8 will work great this way too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barclayphoto Posted November 30, 2004 Author Share Posted November 30, 2004 Well I am the proud owner of this fine piece of equipment. I can't stop smiling! If feels so solid and I love the sound it makes when taking a picture. How stupid does that sound? Kind of like a nice car when you shut the door versus a tin can of a car.. I'm waiting for my first roll to be processed. Can't wait! Now for the 150mm and 50mm lenses... flash, and all else. I can already see why many love this system. I can see a whole new love affair just like has happened with my XPAN. Again thanks for spending my money guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_abbott3 Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 If you're looking to get professional job opportunities, I've noticed the brunt of the ads read, "digital only" or "must have digital SLR"...I just bought a blad system hoping to aim towards the professional market...looks like it may just continue to be a hobby! Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now