._._z Posted January 20, 2005 Share Posted January 20, 2005 <i><blockquote> Can you really pick up a GSW690II for $550 in the US? </blockquote> </i><p> Yes, if you look (and wait) hard enough. Sandy Sorlien picked up one for US $570 almost exactly two years ago as a fast-shooting adjunct for her LF gear. <p> Right now keh.com has an original GW690 for US $484. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich_ullsmith1 Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 I am happy to see the rolleicord recommendations here. I picked one up for . . .free. Cost a hundred bucks to get it working. Here's the kicker: I figured, if this beat up rollei can produce these negatives, just think what a hasselblad will do! About a thousand bucks later, I still get better results from the rollei. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkprints Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 My criteria:<p>1) minimal fancy features<p>2) inexpensive<p>3) only intended use is for landscapes<p>4) relatively good quality optics<p>5) relatively light (a little bulk is ok, but I'd like to keep things on the light side)<p><p>Answer: Holga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 "relatively good" if you don't quite care to delineate much in the landscape, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben conover Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Hi, I bought an old used Fuji G690BL with standard 100mm lens, it cost $630 As Ellis said, a very good camera with 4 lenses. I also want to buy a Super speed graphic, they are even cheaper than the Fuji, and they blow the socks off anything else I can afford. Have fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george_rhodes Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 I strongly discourage you from buying a TLR for landscapes. It is very difficult to use graduated neutral density filters or a polarizer when you can't see through the lens. The SLR that I would recommend is the Pentax 67 or Pentax 67II. It is a great field camera for landscapes. The older, non-electronic Pentax 67 (latest model with mirror lockup, which is a must) is the most economical way to go and I think it is almost as nice as the later 67II, except that it is lacking the dioptor adjustment, aperture priority automation and a few other minor features, that are rather insignifigant for shooting landscapes. Used bodies and lenses are abundant on ebay, at extremely reasonable prices and the optics are optically outstanding. I think Pentax 67 lenses are the best bargain in medium format photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now