michael_araujo Posted May 4, 2004 Share Posted May 4, 2004 Hello, I am interested in purchasing an off brand wide angle lens for my Rebel ti. Are there any suggestions or others who have done the same? I would like to not spend the $600+ right now if I can spend less. Perhaps the future will se me invest in the Canon hardware, but for now my budget doesn't allow. Thanx! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catchlight Posted May 4, 2004 Share Posted May 4, 2004 Michael, are you referring to Canon wide-angle zooms? You can buy very sharp Canon wide angle primes for well under $600. The excellent EF 24mm f2.8 goes for just over $200 mint/used, and the very sharp EF 28mm f2.8 is around $130 or so. An EF 35mm f2 is $180 to $200. If you are set on getting a zoom, check out the EF 20-35mm USM, which is $300 to $350. All of these Canon lenses will outperform the off-brand lenses, and have better resale value, too. (Just be sure to get the dedicated Canon hood to prevent flare with lenses this wide). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 Brent summed it up quite nicely. I'd only wish to add that I have the 35/2 and 24/2.8 and enjoy them a lot. Happy shooting , Yakim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vassil_mihov Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 Michael, I suggest Sigma 20, 24, or 28mm, all f1.8. Contrary to what Brent says, the Canon equvalents (where available) will not outperform these lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_bell Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 I would suggest looking at ratings sites like photodo and photozone.de as they seem very consistent. I like Photozone because you can sort by performance and see who has a better lens at each focal length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WM Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 Hi Michael, I second the Sigma 20mm or 24mm f1.8. They are amazing lenses for what you pay for. And they are only about $300 approx. The Sigma 20mm f1.8 is comparable in quality to my Canon 17-40 f4L, IMHO........but what do I know ? (That's why I still keep my Sigma lenses, although I have the 17-40L). Check out my Sigma shots (most were taken with the Sigma 20mm f1.8): http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=329537 Keep on shootin'.......Wee-Ming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_murray Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 Do not buy an off brand lens... For $120 or so used Canon 22-55mm USM (58mm filters) This is my main lens for my Rebel TI... For $350 or so new Canon 20-35mm USM (77mm filters) As someone pointed out, get the correct lens hoods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crowe Posted May 5, 2004 Share Posted May 5, 2004 The problem with photodo and photozone opinions is that there is no standard against which individuals rate a given lens. If someone has only used one focal length of a particular lens it is impossible for that person to know how it would compare against others of the same length. I thought that the second and third lenses that I bought were perfect until I replaced each of them! Good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now