dkatz02 Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 This woman wants me to take pictures of her for Valentines day. I'm going to shoot her with a D Rebel, she works at Kinkos and wants the digital negatives to print out at Kinkos. My friends tell me I need a Photo Release or something, so the negatives still belong to me and she has the rights to use them. Does anyone have one of these I can use?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted January 14, 2004 Share Posted January 14, 2004 Your information is a bit confused. You own the images unless you sign them away. If you want to make commercial use of the images, and this includes a lot of usages you might not initially think about, you need a model release from the person you are photographing. If she wants to use them for her cards, you can sign a limited usage agreement with her allowing her to do that, specifying the financial transactions involved and the specific usages allowed. Model releases can be found all over the internet if you use a search engine. The other contract is something you may have to search for, or you may get a lawyer. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_milner2 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 To amplify the previous comments slightly, you own the physical negatives AND the copyright of the images, unless you sign them away. As your camera is digital, the principle is the same, but it's easier for people to copy the files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_oneill Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 You own the copyright. If she wants someone else to make prints from them she needs your permission. The one I use is written for English not US law, but it basically says. This agreement was made between (name) - the model, and (name) the photographer, concerning photographs made at (place) on (date). Under this agreement the model agrees that the photographer owns the copyright in the photographs, and may (do the things that the law allows the copyright owner to do). The photographer grants the model a non-exclusive, non transferable licence to use any photographs supplied by the photographer in any way provided that no charge is made for access to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacey_smith4 Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 If she is an employee and printing these herself, probably this is not it, but if she were to take professional looking images to a commerical place, that place may require a release from what they think is a professional studio, before the make copies/prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now