Friends, I am considering the purchase of a Hasselblad, as I indicated in my earlier post. I presently shoot with a Contax G2 with the Zeiss primes. I scan with a Canon FS 4000 and print with an Epson 2200. I like the idea of a considerably larger negative, but wonder whether the quality of the final product vs my Contax, alone, would merit jumping into a new system. I understand that the Epson 2450 or more recent model will scan transparencies (I usually shoot Provia F). How would the quality of a Blad image scanned on a flat bed compare with a 35mm Zeiss image out of my FS4000, and printed to the same dimensions. I would hope to be able to print better quality larger images with the 6x6 format than the 35mm. This is my primary interest in going to MF. Assuming the image is well done, what is the practical size limit for printing a MF slide. Would it be that much bigger than a 35mm Zeiss image? Gads, should I go to 4x5? So many choises. So little restraint. Many thanks.