Julie H Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>I'd like to see examples of photographs that you really like that have almost nothing in them -- with explanation for why you like them, if you care to say so. If not, just a link will do. Pictures may be by others or may be your own. If the latter, please feel free to post them in the thread.</p> <p>For example, here [ <strong><a href="http://unrealnature.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/steinmetz_catspaws.jpg">LINK</a></strong> ] is one of my favorites, by Mark Steinmetz. First of all, he gets big bonus points for succeeding (IMO) in making a fine-art cat photograph. But besides that, for me this picture totally evokes, not so much cat essence as what cats in turn evoke when I'm watching them. A whiff of the supernatural ...</p> <p>That from a tiny bit of anatomy on top of a (perfectly composed) innocuous background -- that actually makes no sense (what is that crack? If it's a door, it seems to be nailed shut).</p> <p>I'd love to see your examples with or without comment. The less content, the better -- but you have to claim/believe that your choice is really good photo.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJHingel Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>Great suggestion Julie. That's my concepts of photography.<br> Whatever you believe to see, it is sure not to be the subject, intended by the photographer. Photos without "stories to tell" and yet photos, that, as I see them, are way more filled with content that makes your mind fly.<br> Most of my favorites are obviously abstract with no clearly identifiable connection to the world as we see it. Others are indeed figurative, showing items of reality, if you look carefully, but which are presented in such a way that the seen reality is of little importance - something else is happening like in this one: "<a href="/photo/15100755">house of cards"</a> or in the one below</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kahn Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>I'm kind of a minimalist and am drawn to photos like this one by <a href="http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/lange/dor12-101.htm">Dorothea Lange</a>. <br /><br /> This is one my own favorites:</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim_Lookingbill Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>Not sure what influence I derived from this shot of my local park's sink lit by 10 AM sun light but it just captivated me by its surreal clarity and simplicity that I nearly got exhausted and sunburned rattling off quite a few shots taken at different angles.</p> <p>I know I've seen this before in some long forgotten coffee table book of illustrations and photographs back in the early '80's but this is the sort of minimalist design in nature I'm drawn to.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gup Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>I've always enjoyed this one but never found anyone else that cared one way or the other. Perhaps it's because I was actually there. Looking at it takes me back to that warm, damp morning, alone, days from home, living out of my van with just my dog for company. I can still hear the silence and smell the damp. </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 I think all photos have roughly the same amount of content but I think I know what you mean<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_reichert1 Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>I enjoy photos with a minimal number of compositional elements, as opposed to minimal content. Distilling a composition down to a few essential elements is often more difficult than successfully arranging a plethora of elements within the frame. This is one of my current favorites.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landrum Kelly Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>While I was sitting at a red light, I saw this shot of raindrops across the parking lot of an auto parts store. I cropped it a bit to include a part of only one vehicle and a fire plug beside a metal post--as well as the rain drops which had originally caught my eye.</p> <p>--Lannie</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaellinder Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julie H Posted May 17, 2014 Author Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>These are wonderful! More! More!</p> <p>Ellis wrote: "I think all photos have roughly the same amount of content but I think I know what you mean."</p> <p>: ) Kind of like the Avedon quote about surfaces that gets trotted out every ten minutes online ("My photographs don’t go below the surface. They don’t go below anything ... "). As if the camera ever did anything else.</p> <p>Tim, your picture reminds me of this picture [ <strong><a href="http://unrealnature.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/evans_washbowl.jpg">LINK</a></strong> ] of Walker Evans's wash basin. The note that you can see in the picture reads: "Please do not disturb the arrangement of the beer caps in the wash bowl."</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Murphy Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>Attached is a minimalist image I entered in the annual Nikon Photo Contest & Nikon published the image for the month of December in their Nikon Photo Contest International Calendar. The squiggly red line is a light on a boat traversing the Barbour in Charleston, SC. Nikon FM2 and 105 f2.5 lens steadied on a battery post.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>Like many photographers who live in San Francisco, I have tons of photographs of the Golden Gate Bridge. These photos, and the ones that appear in books, postcards, on the web, in advertisements for the city, and tour guides give a complete misrepresentation of what The Bridge (as we call it locally, nobody will confuse The Bridge with that other bridge here) looks like much of the time. This is a photo, one of my favorites, of The Bridge as I have seen it on many days.</p> <center><img src="http://spirer.com/images/ggfog.jpg" alt="" width="645" height="474" /></center> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landrum Kelly Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p>Socked in. Very nice, Jeff.</p> <p>--Lannie</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarah_fox Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <p><img src="http://graphic-fusion.com/phsnowytrees1sm.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>Two dogwoods on the Yorktown battlefield one winter.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad_ Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 <center> .<P> <img src= "http://www.citysnaps.net/2014%20Photos/Alcatraz%20Bound.jpg"><BR> <i> Alcatraz Bound • San Francisco • ©Brad Evans 2014 </i> <P> .<P> </center> www.citysnaps.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>My favourite is Eva Rubintein's 'Bed in Mirror' (1972).</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julie H Posted May 18, 2014 Author Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>If you take a print of Jeff Spirer's photo, fold it horizontally in two, crease it sharply, then unfold it, you get a Sugimoto seascape. © Julie H <<< <em>conceptual art</em></p> <p>The above posted examples are wonderful (I know, I already said that ...). I love this kind of photography.</p> <p>More examples from Famous Photographers. I'm leaving aside the abstract/minimal kind of picture that works mainly as a visual exercise/puzzle, even though I <em>love</em> that kind of thing. I have reason to believe that many people ... don't. With that in mind, here are two from Roy DeCarava. [ <strong><a href="https://d1ycxz9plii3tb.cloudfront.net/auction_lots/51cfefc1d0c2ebe3ff000b9f/2/original.jpg">LINK</a></strong> ] and [ <strong><a href="http://www2.gwu.edu/~art/Temporary_SL/ah197/ah197_htmls/chap15/images/15p_decarva_jpg.jpg">LINK></a></strong> ] DeCarava is just an amazing photographer. If you're not familiar with his work, (good lord!) you are in for a treat!</p> <p>Next, two from Aaron Siskind. He seems to be sinking rapidly out of sight in photo history, though in his day, he was considered a giant. First, here [ <strong><a href="http://unrealnature.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/siskind_badlands.jpg">LINK</a></strong> ] is his <em>Badlands</em> (South Dakota) which really suffers in reproduction since you don't get the necessary grassiness of the grass counterpoint.</p> <p>Second example from Siskind is <em>Villahermosa (Olmec)</em> [ <strong><a href="http://unrealnature.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/siskind_olmec.jpg">LINK</a></strong> ]. When you first look at this one, you'll probably think 'I've seen zillions just like that' but look at it more carefully and notice how carefully this one is composed; how expressive it manages to be. Every little detail is an intentional player in a Siskind picture. (And yes, the dead-black is supposed to be dead-black. Dead-black was his favorite color -- and it's one of mine. I wish more people would get over the detail-at-all-costs aversion to velvety, committed, full-bodied black.)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>Niagara Falls simplified.</p> <p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8368/8599817224_8550a162e8_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></p> <p> </p> Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_henderson Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>One of mine from years ago on B&W film. The hedge marks the horizon.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanford Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>I've hovered my finger over the delete button more than once on this one...</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palouse Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p><br /> New moon over the Palouse. Fall harvest and smoke from nearby forest fires make for lousy visibility, but good shooting.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palouse Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>Let's try for the picture this time!<br> New moon over the Palouse. Fall harvest and smoke from nearby forest fires make for lousy visibility, but good shooting.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landrum Kelly Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>Empty Breezeway 2006</p> <p>--Lannie</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kahn Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>Nick, your sunset shot reminded me of this one of mine...</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 <p>Thanks Lannie. I love minimalism. I even perform John Cage's 4'33' while shooting outdoors to enhance the experience.</p> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now