ptkeam Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>So I was interested in getting a constant 2.8-apeture "standard" zoom lens for my D70 bodies. I kind of liked the 24/28-70mm range -- a normal to short tele lens. The Nikon version is out-of-sight expensive @ $1400. So I checked out the Sigma version since I've generally been happy with Sigma lenses. Their version was over $450. Both of these were pretty heavy & bulky.<br> I really just wanted something for somewhat low light "walk-around" use & really didn't want to break the bank. In browsing the KEH inventory I came upon a Sigma 28-70mm 2.8-4DG zoom for $75 bucks. I thought what the heck and got it. It has turned out to be a great little lens -- not only cheap, but lightweight and optically a pretty good performer. The only compromise is the decrease to f/4 at the 70mm focal length. This hasn't proven to be a big deal.<br> This got me to thinking about great, little bargains out there among the "non-sexy" lenses that people have found to use for specific purposes -- ie. travel, telephoto, macro etc. -- that have worked out well for them. What have you found that has hit the nail on the head while not breaking the bank????</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Laur Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>The venerable Nikon 50/1.8, to be sure. I've had sushi and beer tabs that cost more than that little workhorse, which I've used regularly for 20 years.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chriscourt Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>I love my old MF 55mm f2.8 Micro. Battered and scratched-up, but it only cost me $115 and takes great pics :-)</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanbreadsell Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 definitely my 50mm f1.8D, if you can ignore my ugly mug shot I was experimenting...detail, wow...so much detail, even better on the full version<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tibz Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>if not the 50 1.8 the 18-55 kit lens that came with my D50.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>The 50 1.8 has to best deal out there. Mine was $50 mint used. Like all primes, works on Fx too.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_becker2 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>I have an older AIS 50mm f1.4 and 35mm f2 which work very well. The AIS 105mm f2.5 is another great lens available at not to dear a price.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Laur Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Sean: yup, that little lens will show you every nostril hair, won't it? Speaking of noses, a little powder will help with that glare, man.<br /><br />:-) I jest! Someone could be blinded, the way <em>my</em> skin reflects.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpahnelas Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>there are a lot of really nice optics out there you can pick up for very little money... even though i'm about to spring for the $1,400 monster the OP mentioned, i'm really very fond of the little nikkor 28-70/3.5-4.5 i use as a walk-around zoom. also, a lens i bought by mistake turns out to be incredibly sharp: nikkor 100/2.8 E AI-S.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim_knight Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>50/1.8, no doubt about it!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Two favorites actually, one was a $16 Spiratone 400/6.3 telephoto which has a t-mount and I can use it on any of my film SLRs as well as my Nikon D100....delivers good central area around f8-11, softer edges. My 2nd was a Tamron Adaptamatic SP zoom 35-80/2.8 which cost around $23 and I used a couple of years on my F100 and D100...delivered good contrast and sharp results, particularly at the long end.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyinca Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>18-35/3.5-4.5, you can find them cheap these days since its focal length is a sub-set of a lowly but fairly good 18-55 kit lens and not AF-S. IMHO, the 18-35 is, as it is designed to be, a 17-35 on the cheap. At arround $200, it is a great bargain.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_arnold Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>there's no better bargain in all of nikonia than the 50/1.8.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>A few...</p> <p>50/2 AI Nikkor. Pretty much a see-through body cap. Lovely softness wide open, sharpens up smartly stopped down to f/4. Just slightly better than the 50/1.8D AF Nikkor for that versatility.</p> <p>100/4 Spiratone Portragon, fixed aperture T-mount. Way ahead of its time and didn't sell well. The LensBaby is the latest incarnation of a dedicated soft focus lens and was marketed far better. But the Spiratone cost me only around $15 in a pawn shop.</p> <p>135/3.5 Lentar preset T-mount. Another pawn shop puppy. It's been with me through Minolta, Canon FD and Olympus OM systems. Good resolution but with only moderate contrast so it offers a different flavor from my 85/2 AI-S and 105/2.5 AI Nikkors.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hector Javkin Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>A 100mm f/3.5 AF Macro Phoenix lens (but it's appeared under other labels) in Nikon mount. Goes to 1:2 by itself, and 1:1 with included diopter. Very good optics, which I expect to continue to function unless I accidentally hit it against something. A wonderful bargain. Rattles when focusing, but it feels cheap too.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptkeam Posted December 29, 2008 Author Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>I'm really enjoying reading all these posts -- especially the mention of a Spiratone lens -- YIKES!! I haven't heard of Spiratone in years. Talk about a blast from the past. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luca_stramare2 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>I vote for the 50 mm 1.8 as well. On manual focus lenses, the 50 mm E series, which can be found in mint conditions for a little more than the price of two new caps. I paid mine 25$ in 2006. Moving to zoom lenses, the one I can't live without on an AF body is the 35-70 2.8. It is a bit long on the wide side, but it was Nikon flagship of the old days, accepts cheaper 62 mm filters and can be found used for a reasonable price. I still have mine from the mid 90's and won't part with this reliable workhorse.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sven_felsby Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Lex, my 50/2 has nasty bokeh. But I agree with Carl: my 105/2.5 - can be had for <200$ - ooohhh, so sharp and contrasty.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgeorge911 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>While I too love the 50 f1.8, my favorite cheap-o has to be the Nikkor 28-80 G lens (3.3-4.5, I believe). Super light, fast focusing, nice color rendition, sharp enough. Got it as a kit lens with an N75, a few years back. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurence_smith Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>An old-timer still gives me very sharp and contrasty photos. That old-timer is the Super Takumar 55/1.8. Good for portraits, and excellent for sharp walking around as well as landscapes. Going price is $30-$50.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
les_barstow Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Still like my 28-105 ED. As a single walk-around lens with a 1/2 "macro" setting, it still finds time on my camera.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-man1 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Nikon 80-200 ais f/4.5</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonj Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Tokina 19-35mm it's around $149.00 new very solid and sharp!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_helmke1 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 There are three I guess. A 35/2 mf in nearly mint shape was $35. I found an old 80-200/4.5 that had been AI'd that I couldn't leave behind for fifty bucks. It lives in the small bag I don't leave home without. Last is a Phoenix 19-35 I got when I needed a body cap for my first Nikon digital. It's been dropped twice on a tennis court, has a look all its own and didn't cost a dime. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_cagnacci Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 <p>Canon EF 50mm 1.8 II is my current cheap love.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now