brian_w. Posted August 16, 2002 Share Posted August 16, 2002 Hi, I having been thinking of using an XL1s for time lapse purposes, and after talking to the "video guy" at Samy's camera, I was advised that it wouldn't be safe. He said that It would be dangerous for the Video heads because they dont turn off during time lapse (interval) recording. He said, like a VCR on pause, the video heads keep spinning, but unlike a VCR that turns itself off after 5 five minutes to save itself, the XL1s will suffer. Why would Canon make a feature that is bad for its product? (since it recognizes time lapse as a feature). Maybe the Sammy's guy is just assuming that the Xl1s is the same as the Xl1, when really Canon fixed that problem (if it ever existed)? I just dont want to damage the video camera or further shorten its life. Thanks, Brian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_scott2 Posted August 20, 2002 Share Posted August 20, 2002 Don't know if you've tracked down an answer to this problem... you might try to reach someone at Canon. May also want to take a look at www.vidpro.org... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valeriu_campan Posted September 2, 2002 Share Posted September 2, 2002 "Why would Canon make a feature that is bad for its product? " Just look at their lens... it can hardly focus. I answering the question, try getting a laptop with firewire, and automatically capture a frame at a time directly into the computer without running any tape in the camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_marshall Posted September 16, 2002 Share Posted September 16, 2002 I agree with Valeriu, you should not use the Canon's internal recording mechanism for time-lapse, use an external source (Preferably digital). Adobe Premiere has a funtion to capture one frame at a time at pre-selected intervals from a live feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian_w. Posted September 16, 2002 Author Share Posted September 16, 2002 Alight, .. Idealy, it would be nice to grab frames with a laptop..The part I would like to know is WHY. Is it- usual recording is bad for the heads as well, so why do further damage when you could just use a laptop and save a little wear and tear? Is that why? It can be extremely inconvenient to lug around a laptop and deal with another limited power supply and peice of electronics. Thanks : ) Brian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_marshall Posted September 17, 2002 Share Posted September 17, 2002 Using a laptop is only a suggestion. Unfortunately it doesn't suit everyone. Indeed, it is no worse than using the recorder for normal video, but the point is that using an external recording unit can minimise unnecessary wear and tear on the mechanism and therefore extend it's lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_davis Posted October 13, 2002 Share Posted October 13, 2002 The XL1 will shut down and go into standby mode (heads not turning, powered down) after about 10 minutes. The only way to avoid this from happening is to remove the tape. Only then will it stay in record pause mode indefinately. This was built into the camera on purpose for the reason you are speaking. The guy at "Sammies" obviously doesn't know what he's talking about, has probably never used one, nor has he read the manual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now