dayton_p._strickland1 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Do you think Nikon will ever find a firmware solution to improve the digital noise at ISO 1,600? That is my only gripe with this camera. The ergonomics are fantastic and so far (knock on wood) my two D200's and my 17-55/2.8 and 70-200/2.8VR lenses have been much more reliable and dependable than my former equivalent Canon 20D setup. Please Nikon, do something about this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShunCheung Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Whenever you ask whether Nikon will introduce a particular product, the only real answer is that nobody here knows. If you want very good high ISO results and you are happy with the D200, I would suggest looking into the Fuji S5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_olander1664878205 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Everyone seems to complain about high ISO noise, but have you ever looked at the grain from 1600 speed film? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briany Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Who knows? But I doubt that they're going to be able to modify the image processing pipeline that significantly with a firmware update. Is there any precedent for that? Anyway, if they can do it in firmware, you can do it in software, and likely much more effectively, as your computer is much more powerful and flexible than the D200's processor. Get NoiseNinja and you'll be way ahead of any firmware update. Or shoot RAW, where firmware noise reduction (I don't think) has any effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_harris Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I know what you mean about high ISO noice with the D200 but careful exposure really does make a huge difference. Trying to brighten up an under exposed, high ISO, image makes the noise much worse. Simon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliot1 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 What is wrong with my d200? My high iso pictures look great even without using noise reduction software! Using DXO software, my pictures have virtually no noise. And my pictures come out sharp with all my lenses. Any my pictures have superb colors! I must have a lemon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph_i Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 and so far (knock on wood) my two D200's and my 17-55/2.8 and 70-200/2.8VR lenses have been much more reliable and dependable than my former equivalent Canon 20D setup How do you figure? At least you got the "equivelant" part right ;) This high ISO complaining has me chuckle. Ever shot tmz3200? Fuji Press? 400asa Gold, lol. How ever did photography exist in the past!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walterh Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 If a change in the firmware would improve the noise level we most likely would have gotten it long time ago. The limit is most likely the sensor and readout electronics. Removing noise from images after the shot is better done by external software. So the answer is 1) as stated above - nobody knows 2) it is extremely unlikely. By the way - for post-processing the most significant improvement in noise removal is a lot of practice with a good software like noise ninja or neat image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmene Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I use Neat Image and I think that this is the best software for noise reduction. Of course shooting more than 600 ISO , IMO, is something I always try to avoid, exept when I am shooting documentary or sports . I also agree with Walter that reduction on PC is much better than in-camera. Reducing noise you loose information. So we better ask Sony about new sensors with better high ISO quality. PS. Why Hasselblad 3H ISO rates are 50-400 ISO only ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkka_nissila Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I believe that most of the differences between equivalent pixel count Nikon DSLRs in terms of high ISO noise is in the processing of the data. Thus a firmware or a software change would bring them close to each other. I don't think it is worth chasing an upgrade for this reason alone. Improved viewfinders, focusing systems, and sensor size are substantial things which are worth paying for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stwrtertbsratbs5 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 The problem, Elliot, is that you are either looking at prints or you are looking at the entire image on your monitor. Look at actual pixels! Bump up that zoom level and be unhappy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjacksonphoto Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I sometimes shoot Superia 1600 to get MORE grain. I guess I need to shoot more underexposed shots with my D200 so I can retire my FM2n's. Seems some people won't be satisfied until the people in their photos look like the people in a Pixar film... ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_bald Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Very interesting thread exploring an idea for low or no noise - shooting with the D200:<br><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=19880802">click here</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjt Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 hey Dayton ... you know how i get my D200 to produce great high-ISO/low-noise photos? i set it down and pick up my S5 Pro :) you could use NoiseNinja (i use it for non-S5 photos) or Neat Image. also, check out the thread John Bald provided. regards, michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gokce_yildirim2 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Elliot I use DX0 as well. And as far as I see, even if you turn off the noise reduction option, it still applies to a degree which you dont have control on it. Because when I open the same image with raw converter in Photoshop, it is much more grainy without noise reduction. But I really like the results I get with DXO, colors seems more deep and feels like film. My only complaint is the not so good sharpening and the lack of adjusting levels manualy. I get much better sharpening with Lightroom. ok this is going off topic now :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredrik_calabrese Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Why Hasselblad 3H ISO rates are 50-400 ISO only ? Could it be that the camera is geared towards the fashion/advertising industry? they got monkeys to carry everything (big strobes) around for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkka_nissila Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 It doesn't make sense to use a medium format camera for low-light hand-held stuff or action. That's why Hasselblad doesn't spend time developing algorithms for high ISO noise reduction. People who use a Hasselblad are assumed to want detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now