Jump to content

Which is Cooler, Schneider or Rodenstock?


martin_casper

Recommended Posts

I don't want to start another debate about the technical merits of

Schneider vs. Rodenstock lenses because my skills don�t push modern

lenses to their limits. Rather, I�m looking for *opinions* on who

has the �coolest� lens line. Of course each brand has its stars,

like the awesome Super Symmar 110 XL, but which brand is the coolest

overall�the unfiltered Gaulois of large-format optics? Which one

would James Dean have used? I�m excluding Japanese lenses because I

have already concluded that, like Japanese motorcycles, they are

uncool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oy vey. This gets my vote for the all time troll posting -- "the unfiltered Gaulois of large-format optics?" Well, that would have to be Goerz (which ended up being purchased by Schneider). I don't think you could go wrong with any of the 4 big lens makers for "coolness". Fortunately, none of the LF lens producers have become "Zeissed" or "Leicad".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got an old Schneider which makes things look like they were shot in late afternoon or early morning, so I guess that's a 'warm' or maybe 'seriously uncool' lens (I think it's radiation browning. Works great for BW though). So don't get one of those.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin,

 

It's winter here in Sydney - nothing harsh, just chilly. I did a dawn

shot at 7:00am of a house on the harbour.

 

In my Pelican case are 13 Schneiders, 2 Rodenstocks and a

Nikkor. When I opened the case none of them were cool and

displayed the fact by misting up for anything up to 5 minutes. By

the time I'd set the camera on the tripod and checked colour

temperature and light levels the misting had simultaneously

cleared on all the optics - a sure sign that they were all equally

cool.

 

But my breath! Every time I exhaled clouds of vapour streamed

from my facial orifices (orifii?) - where had I left my unfiltered

Gauloise? Damn, maybe I'd sallowed it. (Actually I don't smoke

- the vapour must have been my pent up passion for my cool

lenses finding release.)

 

Just to safeguard the kids - Smoking is injurious to your healt.

No fages are cool.

 

WG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 2 schneiders, a 150/5.6 and a 47/5.6. I'd say they're "dope" or maybe "hella cool." But I also have a rodenstock 90/6.8 that is much bigger than the others, so I guess that one is "phat." what a toss up. why don't you worry about more important things in life.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Busch Vademecum "Casket Set" (convertible lens)

Seven focal lengths 150-750mm in 100mm increments that

allow 29 (or something bizarre and unneccesary like that)

combinations.

 

LET ME TELL YOU, *this* lens is SO COOL, so cool you could

keep a side of beef in it for a month! This lens is so cool that

when I take it out of my camera case, the furnace kicks on! No,

let me tell you, this lens is so cool that the state of Alaska has

asked to borrow it to shore up their perma frost.

 

This lens laughs at all others. (but it doesn't have a shutter)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that there is absolutely no doubt that the Schneider lenses are the coolest.

 

Dave Schneider

 

 

Now if you ignore the family affiliation I'm not sure what is cool. Cool sometimes refers to rare or out of the ordinary. I'm guessing there are about equal numbers of Rodenstock, Schneider and Nikkor so maybe the Fuji is the cool one. Sometimes cool is what the popular people are using, about the same split there I would guess.

 

The fact that none of the modern lenses have been Leica'd or Zeiss'd I assume means that none of achieved legend status that far outweighs any measurable and quantifiable criteria. The closest to cool in this regard are probably the Goerz lenses.

 

You're right, this is a sillier topic than we usually undertake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody gives a darn about your lens when you're shooting LF. Large format <EM>cameras</EM> are cool. You don't need a lens. Try putting a pinhole on your 4x5 sometime... You'll draw the same stares, questions and wierd comments as with glass hanging out the front...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Mr. Dean wouldn't hang out with a Schneider... Schneider sounds like the name of some "white trash" bar-fly we all knew at some point or another. Mr. Rodenstock on the otherhand sounds like a stuffed shirt. Do would Dean hang out with eithe rof these guys? I guess not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know which is coolest, but old Voightländer APO-Lanthars are hot! And even give a slightly warm image due to yellowing from internal radiation...

The same goes, to a lesser extent, for (equally old) Carl Zeiss Planar lenses (e.g. 135m/f3,5).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool? In my surroundings cool are the lenses completely made in Germany (not "lens made in Germany" -and the rest, where are made the rest...?)

 

Some lenses have painted (not engraved) numbers on its barrels... I wonder if it is cool!! (You can ask this to yourself after you received a 1500EUR lens, with a really cheap aspect, also if the lens cap is so loose...

 

Here the Rodenstocks are the winners... I agree about japanese motorcicles are uncool, but everybody wanted my GSXR750R... why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...