Photography is an Art but what is art? Art I should say is the representation or the reconstruction of reality. If we accept this definition, then art teaches because it opens our eyes and makes us understand what life is and where we are going.. So, in the case of photography, a photo in order to be ART must have a back story, or must give a message to the spectator, or must give an answer to a problem of life. THIS IS ART and not the "how beautiful it is!" or "what bright colours!" or "my God what synthesis is that!" and so on. Now we come to the critical point. In order to find out the backstory of a photo, or the message it contains, it needs a certain effort by the spectator which we are not prepared to make, so we choose the easy way of "beautiful pictures". As a new comer to PN, I made an experiment. I put 5 photos, telling a story about human behaviour and how we can restore inner peace. Deep human story which interests everybody, because it is our life and we have to do something about it. I was ready to start a constructive discussion and exchange ideas on this major problem of human behaviour, proposing solutions or finding ways to show these ideas in a better way through photos, but the co-operation was very little. I am sorry to say that the majority of the comments made on photos, are of the type and for the sake of "give me (good ratings), in order to give you". But this in not PHOTOGRAPHY AS AN ART which I am sure PN wants to promote. I should like very much to have your ideas on all these, including the opinion of those who are in charge of PN. Thank you.