web page with photos for you to make fun of

<p>Just look <a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/83187111/">here</a>:)</p>

<p>Uh, I didn't quite title that. That sounds pretty mean spirited... </p><P>

<b>Moderator's note:</b> Thread title changed to accurately describe the content. If you don't want the title changed, don't use cryptic titles and no description of the link's content.

<p>Wonderful. Hilarious!</p>

<p>Actually, "Amateur Photography Gone Wrong" is a pretty good title, except that some of those shots seem to be, uh, "professional", judging from the few IDs that weren't wisely redacted. Remember the Thursday thread here, "Is Photography Dead?" Well, now we know who's trying to kill it.</p>

<p>I guess we should appreciate their efforts, because they make the rest of us look so damn good... :-)</p>

<p>They're certainly bad, but spend 5 minutes on Flickr and you'll be in the same boat, essentially.</p>

<p>Terrible! And not even on single of my photos included.</p>

<p>Wow. Is there some way to un-see that? I need some sort of mental cache-clearing option.</p>

<p>Might be wrong but this could be the inspiration for all the awful photo and butt-ugly tattoo sites. Still hilariously funny, too:</p>

<p>http://www.cakewrecks.com/</p>

<p>http://youarenotaphotographer.com/</p>

<p>Context is everything. I kind of liked Number 5 and loved Number 19, which brought a quick and lasting smile to my face. Coming in the right portfolio, each could make a compelling visual statement. My guess is, though, they didn't come within a body of work that would support them much.</p>

<p>What has been seen cannot be unseen.....</p>

<p>Thanks Leslie. I am now blind in one eye and cant see out of the other.</p>

<p>I really learned something from the FB comments on some of those photos...</p>

<p>1. I didn't know you could change Facebook's UI font and size.<br>

2. Stay away from Facebook as much as possible.</p>

<p>What's so funny about 34 examples of blatant copyright violation for the purpose of making fun of other people's pictures by someone who clearly doesn't have the talent to produce original content for their website.</p>

<p>It's sad on a number of levels, not funny.</p>

<p>Ebaumsworld is near the bottom of a pile of internet crap that thrives on schadenfreude. They blatantly rip off or, as they prefer to think of it, "aggregate", content from better sites... okay, less bad sites.</p>

<p>That said, I've taken or made worse photos than some of those.</p>

<p>"Amateur Photography Gone Wrong" is a pretty bad title as many of those appear to be professional photos and cost people money.</p>

<blockquote>

<p ><a name="00bYGn"></a><a href="/photodb/user?user_id=172915">Lex Jenkins</a> <a href="/member-status-icons"><img title="Moderator" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/mod.gif" alt="" /><img title="Subscriber" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/sub10plus.gif" alt="" /><img title="Frequent poster" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/3rolls.gif" alt="" /></a>, Apr 13, 2013; 09:08 p.m.</p>

</blockquote>

 

<blockquote>

<p>That said, I've taken or made worse photos than some of those.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Ditto, Lex. In 2006 I thought this photo was really cool.</p>

<p> </p>

<div></div>

<p>Actually, Steve, that's not too bad from a "Pop Art" Warhol-esque POV.</p>

<p>Come on! You're going to have to do badder than that.</p>